Re: RAIDframe, troubles with root on raid with recent -current

2008-04-18 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:51:10PM -0400, Kenneth R Westerback wrote: > This is currently broken (deliberately) as changes are made to the > logic concerning mounting the root disk. There are some more changes > that need to be made before a fix to raidframe can be committed. Thanks, Ken!

Re: RAIDframe, troubles with root on raid with recent -current

2008-04-18 Thread Kenneth R Westerback
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:10:48PM -0400, Josh Grosse wrote: > I've been using root on raid for some years, and am using a -current system > from March 22. > > I've been unable to boot recently built kernels unless I use boot -a and > select device raid0a manually. My older kernel works fine.

Re: RAIDframe, troubles with root on raid with recent -current

2008-04-18 Thread Josh Grosse
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 06:10:48PM -0400, I made a typo: ># mount /dev/raidoa /mnt D'oh! Typin' stuff by hand, rather than pasting directly.

RAIDframe, troubles with root on raid with recent -current

2008-04-18 Thread Josh Grosse
I've been using root on raid for some years, and am using a -current system from March 22. I've been unable to boot recently built kernels unless I use boot -a and select device raid0a manually. My older kernel works fine. With new kernels, booting -s I get: # mount root_device on / ty

Re: raidframe troubles

2008-03-02 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-03-02, Almir Karic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > # newfs /dev/rraid0a correct, raw device i.e. /dev/rraid0a for newfs. > # mount /dev/rraid0a /mnt/ > mount_ffs: /dev/rraid0a on /mnt: Block device required you need the block device, i.e. /dev/raid0a, not the raw device.

raidframe troubles

2008-03-02 Thread Almir Karic
i did all the things reccommanded by the summary section of raidctl(8) (i even tried changing the 'a' partition to 'e', to be the same as in the man page, no luck), i also tried following http://unixsadm.blogspot.com/2007/10/openbsd-raidframe-mirror-software-raid.html no change either. my GENERIC.