Re: question about spamdb -a

hmm, on Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 09:29:50AM -0700, Bob Beck said that > You seem to think there will be one grey entry. there could > be many, depending on how many combinations of FROM And TO have been > attempted from that IP address. interesting. yes, i was thinking in small :) > > seems l

Re: question about spamdb -a

* frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-03-07 03:15]: > hmm, on Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:12:14PM -0700, Bob Beck said that > > because you're only added the whitelist entry, not deleted > > a grey one. > > > > The grey entry is harmless, it will get reaped out of there > > in 4 hours w

Re: question about spamdb -a

hmm, on Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 03:12:14PM -0700, Bob Beck said that > because you're only added the whitelist entry, not deleted > a grey one. > > The grey entry is harmless, it will get reaped out of there > in 4 hours when it expires.. wouldn't it make sense to delete the grey entry

Re: question about spamdb -a

because you're only added the whitelist entry, not deleted a grey one. The grey entry is harmless, it will get reaped out of there in 4 hours when it expires.. -Bob * frantisek holop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-02-27 15:03]: > hi there, > > when i explicitly whit

question about spamdb -a

hi there, when i explicitly whitelist an ip address which just turned up in spamdb as GREY, why is it still there also as GREY? yyinteger> spamdb GREY|xx.xx.xx.xx|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>|1141076813|1141091213|1141091213|1|0 integer> sudo spamdb -a xx.xx.xx.xx integer> spamdb WHI