Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-29 Thread Amit Kulkarni
> OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENERIC) #3: Mon May 23 21:40:58 MDT 2011 >dera...@i386.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC > cpu0: Intel 486DX2 ("GenuineIntel" 486-class) > cpu0: FPU,V86 > real mem = 66646016 (63MB) > avail mem = 54743040 (52MB) > mainbus0 at root > bios0 at mainbus0: A

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-29 Thread Nick Holland
On 05/27/11 23:14, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: ... > Has tmux been fixed to work on < 150 MHz computers since it has > moved to libevent? Have you stopped beating your wife and kids? [ ] yes[ ] no Anyway... tmux seems to work just fine on a well-under 150MHz system here. OpenBSD 4.9-current (GENE

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-29 Thread Abel Abraham Camarillo Ojeda
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Martin Pelikan wrote: > Have you ever tried to use screen inside a screen? ssh'd to other > machines? B Not to mention ^A is beginning-of-line in most terminals. I generally map ^a to be the prefix key on tmux...

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-29 Thread Martin Pelikan
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades > properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything > new themselves (the 8bit version ones). Have you ever tried to use screen inside a screen? ssh'

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread Helmut Schneider
Nick Holland wrote: > On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > [Problem with screen] [...] > http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq7.html#tmux > man tmux [...] Thanks for all replies (also by pm), tmux indeed looks promissing. Helmut

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread Ted Unangst
No program, no matter how poorly written, can crash a correctly written kernel. On May 28, 2011, at 4:54 AM, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > >> Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades >> properly. Even

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread Miod Vallat
> And tmux seems better written. On the Yeeloong, using > screen will send you in a kernel failure with a Trap 4 > error, while using tmux you can do anything you want, > it's rock stable. screen has some shitty code inside > that overflows my fb and miod even tried to fix it > but it keeps crashin

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread Miod Vallat
> Has tmux been fixed to work on < 150 MHz computers since it has > moved to libevent? Define `fixed'. What do you consider broken? I use tmux daily on 2-digit MHz machines, but then I don't use the status bar because I have no use for it. Miod

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread David Vasek
On Sat, 28 May 2011, gilbert.fernan...@orange.fr wrote: If you try screen on some machines, you will crash so badly that even DDB inside the kernel is frozen after displaying one or two lines of panic. At first, you wonder. Then you try tmux, and it no longer crashes. Never blame an applicatio

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread gilbert . fernandes
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15:14PM -0400, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades > properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything > new themselves (the 8bit version ones). If you try screen on some machines, you will crash so

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-28 Thread gilbert . fernandes
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27:59PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > dunno what "works fine" means, but today, we use a program called > "tmux", which is part of base OpenBSD. And tmux seems better written. On the Yeeloong, using screen will send you in a kernel failure with a Trap 4 error, while usin

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-27 Thread Ted Unangst
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:15 PM, Hugo Villeneuve wrote: > Has tmux been fixed to work on < 150 MHz computers since it has > moved to libevent? Has anyone reported what doesn't work?

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-27 Thread Theo de Raadt
> Just saying that at least, screen has been working for decades > properly. Even if it was archaic. But it's not like tty are anything > new themselves (the 8bit version ones). Go read the source code some time. bye bye.

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-27 Thread Hugo Villeneuve
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 10:27:59PM -0400, Nick Holland wrote: > On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty > > or ssh nothing seems to happen: > > screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archa

Re: putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-27 Thread Nick Holland
On 05/27/11 14:53, Helmut Schneider wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty > or ssh nothing seems to happen: screen? screen? I dimly recall a program called screen. Archaic piece of sh**, as I recall. > [helmut@OBSDHelmut ~]$ screen ls -la > [sc

putty or ssh, screen $cmd

2011-05-27 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I'd like to supply a command to screen. Unfortunatly when using putty or ssh nothing seems to happen: [helmut@OBSDHelmut ~]$ screen ls -la [screen is terminating] [helmut@OBSDHelmut ~]$ [helmut@BSDHelmut ~]$ ssh -t obsdhelmut screen ls -la Enter passphrase for key '/home/helmut/.ssh/id_dsa':