o?= wrote:
I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
procfs is the unix port of a /Plan9/ Design priciple: "everything should
be like a file".
You can find A LOT of information here: http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/
--
Mauro Rezzonico , Como, Italia
"Maybe this world
>hmm, on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:44:07PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that
>> The major reason for moving away from procfs is that there are
>> numerous TOCTOU problems.
>
>out of curiousity, in principle, what is the difference between
>accessing a through /procfs and the same value through sysctl,
>
hmm, on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 02:44:07PM -0600, Theo de Raadt said that
> The major reason for moving away from procfs is that there are
> numerous TOCTOU problems.
out of curiousity, in principle, what is the difference between
accessing a through /procfs and the same value through sysctl,
and/or
hmm, on Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 03:01:18PM +, Matthew Szudzik said that
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:34:20PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> > to remove unused bit rotting stuff. what's the deal with procfs?
> >
> > if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
> > why is it left
>> if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
>> why is it left to rot?
>
>It is left there for historical reasons, because some old applications
>may use it.
>
>For new applications we do not use it, but prefer to use a properly
>designed sysctl or ioctl
>interface to retrieve i
I wouldn't miss it...
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 08:49:15AM -0600, Bob Beck wrote:
> > if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
> > why is it left to rot?
>
> It is left there for historical reasons, because some old applications
> may use it.
>
> For new applications we do not
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 04:34:20PM +0200, frantisek holop wrote:
> to remove unused bit rotting stuff. what's the deal with procfs?
>
> if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
> why is it left to rot?
It's necessary for compat_linux. See the man page.
> if it's use is far from recommended, indeed rather forbidden,
> why is it left to rot?
It is left there for historical reasons, because some old applications
may use it.
For new applications we do not use it, but prefer to use a properly
designed sysctl or ioctl
interface to retrieve informatio
hmm, on Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Ted Unangst said that
> 2009/9/22 Sergio Andris Gsmez del Real :
> > maybe a little reference would be great, cause very little or non
> literature
> > is found about OpenBSD implementation... (or maybe I'm struggling
> > searching). I just wanna say I
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 10:26:48PM -0400, Ted Unangst wrote:
> 2009/9/22 Sergio Andris Gsmez del Real :
> > maybe a little reference would be great, cause very little or non
> literature
> > is found about OpenBSD implementation... (or maybe I'm struggling
> > searching). I just wanna say I'm lovin
2009/9/22 Sergio Andris Gsmez del Real :
> maybe a little reference would be great, cause very little or non
literature
> is found about OpenBSD implementation... (or maybe I'm struggling
> searching). I just wanna say I'm loving the system (and the phylosophy).
The OpenBSD implementation of procf
Hi.
Sorry about the late response.
I do know what problem am having and what exactly I want, sorry didn't post
my original intention.
I would like to know more about procfs implemention in OpenBSD, not just
knowing how to mount it... That's what I refered to when I said "didn't have
success while
Hi.
Sorry about the late response.
I do know what problem am having and what exactly I want, sorry didn't post
my original intention.
I would like to know more about procfs implemention in OpenBSD, not just
knowing how to mount it... That's what I refered to when I said "didn't have
success while
2009/9/20 Daniel Bolgheroni :
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Sergio Andr?s G?mez del Real wrote:
>> I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
>
> This?
>
> # mount -t procfs /proc /proc
Great, now we have another user doing stuff without understanding why.
Even better, it's with pr
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, Sergio Andr?s G?mez del Real wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
This?
# mount -t procfs /proc /proc
Teers,
--
Daniel Bolgheroni
FEI - Faculdade de Engenharia Industrial
http://www.dbolgheroni.eng.br/mykey
ASCII ribbon campai
U what?
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Paige Thompson wrote:
> yeah what problem :D :D :D :D :D
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Marco Peereboom
> wrote:
>
> > what problem are you trying to solve?
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 08:38:48PM -0500, Sergio Andr?s G?mez del Real
> > wr
yeah what problem :D :D :D :D :D
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Marco Peereboom wrote:
> what problem are you trying to solve?
>
> On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 08:38:48PM -0500, Sergio Andr?s G?mez del Real
> wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
what problem are you trying to solve?
On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 08:38:48PM -0500, Sergio Andr?s G?mez del Real wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
Manual page description of mount_procfs(8)
http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=mount_procfs&sektion=8&apropos=0
&manpath=OpenBSD+Current&arch=i386
2009/9/19 Sergio Andris Gsmez del Real :
> Hi.
>
> I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
Hi.
I failed googling about this topic. Any help please? :D :D :D :D
20 matches
Mail list logo
