On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 15:27 CEST, Stuart Henderson
wrote:
> On 2014-06-18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > The only difference I see, but I'm unsure if this is OK or not, is that
> > the OpenBSD box sends ENCAPSULATION_MODE = TUNNEL, and the
> > Cisco box sends ENCAPSULATION_MODE = UDP_
On 2014-06-18, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> The only difference I see, but I'm unsure if this is OK or not, is that
> the OpenBSD box sends ENCAPSULATION_MODE = TUNNEL, and the
> Cisco box sends ENCAPSULATION_MODE = UDP_ENCAP_TUNNEL.
> I'm not sure if that is expected, since the Cisco is behind a
On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 08:49 CEST, Remi Locherer
wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm trying to establish an IPSec tunnel between an OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64)
> > box and a Cisco 2901, the whole day, but doesn't seem to
> > get it t
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 05:34:27PM +0200, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to establish an IPSec tunnel between an OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64)
> box and a Cisco 2901, the whole day, but doesn't seem to
> get it to work. I think I have something wrong with the
> crypto transforms for phase
Hi,
I'm trying to establish an IPSec tunnel between an OpenBSD 5.5 (amd64)
box and a Cisco 2901, the whole day, but doesn't seem to
get it to work. I think I have something wrong with the
crypto transforms for phase two, since this NO_PROPOSAL_CHOSEN
I get in the logs, which I think is in phase t
5 matches
Mail list logo