On 2011-01-31, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>> Also, I've noticed that if I don't have X11 installed, I can't seem to
>> install certain packages (such as subversion) and certain ports
>> (EMACS, and even if I set FLAVOR=no_x11). What's up with that?
>
> xbase is now mandatory for packages, even no_x1
There is an out-of-date script in infrastructure/build . It looks to me
that it list everything installed. If it needs to be updated, it tells you
that too.
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:42 PM, Bryan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:29, wrote:
> > Hey all,
> >
> > I have a script to sort of
> $ pkg_info | grep ^banana- > /dev/null
Could also be
$ pkg_info | grep -q ^banana-
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 13:29, wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> hurt to run it several times).
>
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
>
Hi Travis,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 12:29 PM, wrote:
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> in that it will reinstall. B Is there a way I can test for whether a
> package has been installed already, given only the package name, and
> not necessarily the executabl
> > I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> > bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> > hurt to run it several times).
> > Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> > in that it will reinstall.
> Is there a way
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 2:29 PM, wrote:
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
> in that it will reinstall. Is there a way I can test for whether a
> package has been installed already, given only the package name, and
> not necessarily the executable name (if th
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 01:29:40PM -0600, tra...@subspacefield.org wrote:
> I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
> bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
> hurt to run it several times).
>
> Currently I install some packages, but that's a b
Hey all,
I have a script to sort of kickstart an installation after doing a
bare install of OpenBSD, and it's designed to be idempotent (won't
hurt to run it several times).
Currently I install some packages, but that's a bit of a time-waster
in that it will reinstall. Is there a way I can test
On 2008-04-02, Barry Commander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> how can I list flavors for dependencies of a given port and ensure when
> doing make install, a dependency isn't going to
> install a lot of stuff I don't want?
See bsd.port.mk(5)
Sorry, a cat ran across my keyboard and hit send.
I follow current which is the reason I don't just use packages and can make
dependency
flavor decisions in a matter of seconds.
Thanks so very much
Barry
Hi
how can I list flavors for dependencies of a given port and ensure when
doing make install, a dependency isn't going to
install a lot of stuff I don't want?
I follow curre
12 matches
Mail list logo
