Re: pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

2005-11-22 Thread levitch
>On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:38:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> It seemed like time to update and get the new ftp-proxy. During this I >> ran >> >> 'pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*' while updating the sources. The OpenBSD >> >> build

Re: pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

2005-11-22 Thread Marc Espie
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 07:38:00PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> It seemed like time to update and get the new ftp-proxy. During this I > ran > >> 'pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*' while updating the sources. The OpenBSD > >> build was okay, but ports

Re: pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

2005-11-21 Thread levitch
>> It seemed like time to update and get the new ftp-proxy. During this I ran >> 'pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*' while updating the sources. The OpenBSD >> build was okay, but ports are not building now. The command might have >> been package-specific; i.e.

Re: pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

2005-11-21 Thread Alexandre Anriot
> It seemed like time to update and get the new ftp-proxy. During this I ran > 'pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*' while updating the sources. The OpenBSD > build was okay, but ports are not building now. The command might have > been package-specific; i.e., perhaps I should hav

pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*

2005-11-21 Thread levitch
It seemed like time to update and get the new ftp-proxy. During this I ran 'pkg_delete -q /var/db/pkg/*' while updating the sources. The OpenBSD build was okay, but ports are not building now. The command might have been package-specific; i.e., perhaps I should have used 'port uni