> On 2025-03-14, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
>> Hello
>> I have this answers when i try:
>> # pkg_add -u and # syspatch: i have 2 VMs at different provider! What is
>> it happening please? Vultr works correctly. Additionally: it is an ikev2
>> server: server to ser
>> I have this answers when i try:
>> # pkg_add -u and # syspatch: i have 2 VMs at different provider! What is
>> # pkg_add -u
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.6/packages-stable/amd64/: ftp:
>> connect: Permission denied
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/
Hello
I have this answers when i try:
# pkg_add -u and # syspatch: i have 2 VMs at different provider! What is
it happening please? Vultr works correctly. Additionally: it is an ikev2
server: server to server and roadwarrior to server; it is a
reinstallation; because the folers at /etc/iked were
> I have this answers when i try:
> # pkg_add -u and # syspatch: i have 2 VMs at different provider! What is
> # pkg_add -u
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.6/packages-stable/amd64/: ftp:
> connect: Permission denied
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.6/packages/am
On 2025-03-14, lati...@vcn.bc.ca wrote:
> Hello
> I have this answers when i try:
> # pkg_add -u and # syspatch: i have 2 VMs at different provider! What is
> it happening please? Vultr works correctly. Additionally: it is an ikev2
> server: server to server and roadwarrior to
check and allow it to clean
> the extra reverse dependencies in php-XXX packages. and then pkg_add -u.
> then continue to use nextcloud's admin interface for nextcloud updates.
>
Thank you very much, Stuart.
That was the correct solution for me, and helped me a lot.
Regards.
On 2024-11-25, Mark wrote:
> Hello, under OpenBSD 7.6, I have Nextcloud installed.
>
> I installed the Nextcloud package via pkg_add, and then I upgraded it
> on its Web admin interface up to 30.0.2.
for future reference, if you install something from packages, use
package tools
Hello, under OpenBSD 7.6, I have Nextcloud installed.
I installed the Nextcloud package via pkg_add, and then I upgraded it
on its Web admin interface up to 30.0.2.
I'd like to upgrade my php-8.2.25 package to 8.2.26 via pkg-add -u,
however nextcloud package claims;
"Collision in
On 2024-10-09, red.s...@posteo.net wrote:
> (Thanks Jesse for the help)
>
> Seems pkg_add with -n option shows errors.
> However if I just go though with the actual install pkg_add -aU
> things worked just fine.
Yes it's a pkg_add bug with -n, though fairly easily worked
(Thanks Jesse for the help)
Seems pkg_add with -n option shows errors.
However if I just go though with the actual install pkg_add -aU
things worked just fine.
[Im sure pkg_add -n worked fine on 7.5]
Anyway, thank you.
On 08.10.2024 23:45, red.s...@posteo.net wrote:
Hi
Since upgrading to
BSD pc.lan 7.6 GENERIC.MP#338 amd64
$ more /etc/installurl
https://www.mirrorservice.org/pub/OpenBSD
EXAMPLE (Firefox)
-----
$ pkg_add -n firefox
quirks-7.50 signed on 2024-09-28T18:31:43Z
firefox-130.0.1p0:libxml-2.13.3p0 (extracting)| |
0%^[firefox-130.0.1p0:libxml-2.13.3p0: o
> > While I have had updates fail in the past, I've never seen the output
> > "partial installation recorded ...".
> >
> > Am I correct that the best way of dealing with this is via re-running:
> > pkg_add ? Are any manual steps required for deali
On 2024-08-04 18:47, J Doe wrote:
Hello list,
I updated one of my OpenBSD 7.5 servers via: pkg_add today using the
following:
$ pkg_add -uvi
... and the installation progressed until it reached PHP 8.2. My server
had been using PHP 8.2.21 from packages, so this was an upgrade to the
Hello list,
I updated one of my OpenBSD 7.5 servers via: pkg_add today using the
following:
$ pkg_add -uvi
... and the installation progressed until it reached PHP 8.2. My server
had been using PHP 8.2.21 from packages, so this was an upgrade to the
latest release.
During install I noted
install them locally.
If the pkg database in too bad a state to pkg_delete, you could produce
a list, move /var/db/pkg out of the way, and pkg_add using that list
over the top - there will be "missing package registration, do you want
to fix?" questions which you can answer yes to.
t-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > On July 2nd, I updated a machine to the latest snapshot and rebooted. It
> > came back without issue. I then issued `pkg_add -U`. This machine was
&
back without issue. I then issued `pkg_add -U`. This machine was last
> updated on June 6th, so not terribly long ago. Partway during the process,
> the disk indicated it was full (not true) and no commands were available
> (ls, cd, etc). Unable to do anything, I terminated my SSH session and
>
Hello,
On July 2nd, I updated a machine to the latest snapshot and rebooted. It
came back without issue. I then issued `pkg_add -U`. This machine was last
updated on June 6th, so not terribly long ago. Partway during the process,
the disk indicated it was full (not true) and no commands were
On Sat, 2023-12-09 at 11:55 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> I suggest trying a mirror instead then, and see if there's any
> difference. Pick one from www.openbsd.org/ftp.html.
Good suggestion.
Recent installer changes to simplify the sets "disk" option are
awesome. At the same time, this likel
On 2023/12/08 15:40, David Rinehart wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 08:37 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2023-12-07, David Rinehart wrote:
> > >
> > > I see the same with multiple installs - Started with 7.4. No
> > > modification to default installurl.
> >
> > The contents of the 'defaul
On Fri, 2023-12-08 at 08:37 +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2023-12-07, David Rinehart wrote:
> >
> > I see the same with multiple installs - Started with 7.4. No
> > modification to default installurl.
>
> The contents of the 'default' installurl depend on whuch mirror you
> selected to in
On 2023-12-07, David Rinehart wrote:
>
> I see the same with multiple installs - Started with 7.4. No
> modification to default installurl.
The contents of the 'default' installurl depend on whuch mirror you
selected to install from.
I see the same with multiple installs - Started with 7.4. No
modification to default installurl.
It is amazing - For 5 years, I never considered that pkg_add(1) could
fail (and it didn't)! Updating my install scripts to try until the
last package add, with -l option, is confirmed. A l
On Thu, Dec 07, 2023 at 12:35:01PM -, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> pkg_add/ftp aren't good at retrying when network connections fail.
> I'd think it's more likely a problem with your network connection
> than the cdn server, but you could try one of the other mirrors
>
several since i do a few tries and then the problem goes and comes
> at different packages
>
> pkg_add: Ustar [package name, it is different every try, meaning
> lcms2-2.15.tgz, gstreamer, libass-] [?]: Error while reading header
> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/pac
pkg_add: Ustar [package name, it is different every try, meaning
lcms2-2.15.tgz, gstreamer, libass-] [?]: Error while reading header
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages/amd64/lame-3.100p1.tgz:
Read short file
My configuration are:
1 laptop, re0, trying pkg_add feh
1 laptop, iwn0, trying
pkg_add: Ustar [package name, it is different every try, meaning
lcms2-2.15.tgz, gstreamer, libass-] [?]: Error while reading header
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.4/packages/amd64/lame-3.100p1.tgz:
Read short file
My configuration are:
1 laptop, re0, trying pkg_add feh
1 laptop, iwn0, trying
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 09:17:58PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any recent major change in base packages or pkg_add?
> I ask because the pkg_add -vV is slower than usual at each package,
> most of the time spent in Extracting ... phase.
> I use amd64
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 7:09 PM Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 09:17:58PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is there any recent major change in base packages or pkg_add?
> > I ask because the pkg_add -vV is slower than usual at e
On 2023-09-18, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 09:17:58PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Is there any recent major change in base packages or pkg_add?
>> I ask because the pkg_add -vV is slower than usual at each package,
>>
On Sun, Sep 17, 2023 at 09:17:58PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there any recent major change in base packages or pkg_add?
> I ask because the pkg_add -vV is slower than usual at each package,
> most of the time spent in Extracting ... phase.
> I use amd64
Hello,
Is there any recent major change in base packages or pkg_add?
I ask because the pkg_add -vV is slower than usual at each package,
most of the time spent in Extracting ... phase.
I use amd64 recent snapshot. I checked my disk and https downloads,
they are fine.
Thank you.
edure for both upgrades was:
>
> # sysupgrade
> # syspatch
> # pkg_add -u
>
> What is wrong, and how to repair it please?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
Ops i found the answer at misc archives:
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=163762126127301&w=2
The point is that the s
# syspatch
# pkg_add -u
What is wrong, and how to repair it please?
Thanks.
g pending updates in advance of
> actual review and installation (see <
> https://github.com/morgant/swupdate-openbsd/issues/14>. I've been
> studying the pkg_add(1) manual, testing, and also reviewing the pkg_add
> Perl source in src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/, but while really wel
thub.com/morgant/swupdate-openbsd/issues/14>. I've been studying
the pkg_add(1) manual, testing, and also reviewing the pkg_add Perl source
in src/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/, but while really well structured and easy
to read, the latter does take me longer to grok than the former.
I'm ho
Hi,
looks like after recent changes in -current pkg_add become broken:
$ pkg_add -n scapy
quirks-6.130 signed on 2023-05-16T19:13:11Z
scapy-2.4.4p4:py3-cparser-2.21: ok
pkg_add: Can't locate object method "new" via package
"OpenBSD::PackingList::Depend" (perhaps you
On 2023-05-14, Judah Kocher wrote:
> Some web searching has not turned up any details around this. I also do
> not see python 3.9 as an installable option via pkg_add, just 3.10 and
> 3.11.
3.9 is still there.
> Does this mean that installing python via pkg_add installs
python scripts that
update various public DNS records when my public IP changes started failing
with generic segfaults. I did see the note in the OpenBSD Upgrade Guide
about 3.10 being the new default so I ran pkg_add -u which updated python to
3.10 and now the same scripts fail but with this error
e
> about 3.10 being the new default so I ran pkg_add -u which updated python to
> 3.10 and now the same scripts fail but with this error:
>
> ImportError: urllib3 v2.0 only supports OpenSSL 1.1.1+, currently the 'ssl'
> module is compiled with LibreSSL 3.7.2. See:
> http
After updating one of my routers to OpenBSD 7.3, my python scripts that
update various public DNS records when my public IP changes started
failing with generic segfaults. I did see the note in the OpenBSD
Upgrade Guide about 3.10 being the new default so I ran pkg_add -u which
updated python
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2022/06/04 15:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> > Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > If you are running -current and have not updated base recently, you
> > > may run inTO "pkg_add: Unknown option: always-update ".
> >
On 2022/06/04 15:23, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> > If you are running -current and have not updated base recently, you
> > may run inTO "pkg_add: Unknown option: always-update ".
> > To fix it, just update to a newer base snapshot.
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> If you are running -current and have not updated base recently, you
> may run inTO "pkg_add: Unknown option: always-update ".
> To fix it, just update to a newer base snapshot.
What happened is that a developer made a change to the pkg tools which
If you are running -current and have not updated base recently, you
may run inTO "pkg_add: Unknown option: always-update ".
To fix it, just update to a newer base snapshot.
Ah, I guessed it was a feature now and I like it, it just threw me the
first time.
On Friday, April 29, 2022, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:37:39PM -0500, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> > I'm on OpenBSD AMD64 7.1, fresh install
> > I noticed when adding fon
On Thu, Apr 28, 2022 at 02:37:39PM -0500, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> I'm on OpenBSD AMD64 7.1, fresh install
> I noticed when adding fonts via pkg_add it no longer prints out "You may
> wish to" after installation is finished.
It's related to the evolution of
Changelog (just the facts - Awesome!):
https://www.openbsd.org/plus71.html
A search for "font" on the page shows 3 entries...
On 4/28/22 12:37, Christopher Turkel wrote:
> I'm on OpenBSD AMD64 7.1, fresh install
> I noticed when adding fonts via pkg_add it no longe
I'm on OpenBSD AMD64 7.1, fresh install
I noticed when adding fonts via pkg_add it no longer prints out "You may
wish to" after installation is finished.
is this a bug, or a feature?
> Please reconsider my suggestion made on 2022-01-14:
Everybody wants to be a dev.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 10:21:33AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> I highly appreciate the carefulness, but the error message doesn't
> indicate a user "_pkgfetch", nor is it mentioned on pkg_add(1).
> Please reconsider my suggestion made on 2022-01-14:
>
Note that smtpd
I highly appreciate the carefulness, but the error message doesn't
indicate a user "_pkgfetch", nor is it mentioned on pkg_add(1).
Please reconsider my suggestion made on 2022-01-14:
> In general, if there is a permission problem due to file system
> access bits, then it wou
which doesn't
> > require
> > it. That seems way more unreasonable than your original assumption.
> >
>
> I am not arguing about the access permissions (which I screwed
> up), but I wonder why pkg_add run by root failed with EPERM?
> Actually root was the only on
which doesn't
> > require
> > it. That seems way more unreasonable than your original assumption.
> >
>
> I am not arguing about the access permissions (which I screwed
> up), but I wonder why pkg_add run by root failed with EPERM?
> Actually root was the onl
about the access permissions (which I screwed
up), but I wonder why pkg_add run by root failed with EPERM?
Actually root was the only one *permitted* to access this file.
Thats not an error.
If there was another user account involved, then show me.
On 2022-01-14, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 2022-01-14 10:42:56, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> trying to upgrade the installed packages I get
>>
>> # pkg_add -u
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS conn
rying to upgrade the installed packages I get
> >>
> >> # pkg_add -u
> >> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS
> >> connect failure: failed to open CA file '/etc/ssl/cert.pem': Permission
> >> denied
> >> htt
On 2022-01-14, Harald Dunkel wrote:
> On 2022-01-14 10:42:56, Harald Dunkel wrote:
>>
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> trying to upgrade the installed packages I get
>>
>> # pkg_add -u
>> https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS conn
| This happens on 2 OpenBSD hosts. On 5 others there is no such problem.
Do you have an explanation why the 2 host out of 7 are behaving different?
I don't find it "reasonable" that 2 host out of 7 manifest some different
behavior on their own.
Hi folks,
trying to upgrade the installed packages I get
# pkg_add -u
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS connect
failure: failed to open CA file '/etc/ssl/cert.pem': Permission denied
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages/amd64/: T
On 2022-01-14 10:42:56, Harald Dunkel wrote:
Hi folks,
trying to upgrade the installed packages I get
# pkg_add -u
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS connect
failure: failed to open CA file '/etc/ssl/cert.pem': Permission denied
https://cdn.openb
cdn. Almost certainly
> it was pointing at a machine which only serves the cdn and you cannot
> access directly.
pkg_add explicitly shows it in the first file it retrieves.
For various reasons (consistency), we don't do cdn round-robin on each
package. The Redirect from the first connec
On 2022-01-02, Jon Fineman wrote:
> I am in New Jersey. Is there a way for me to tell what the cdn was
> pointing to to help find the slow/sick server?
It's shown in HTTP response headers from cdn. Almost certainly
it was pointing at a machine which only serves the cdn and you cannot
access dire
Yesterday (1 Jan 2022) I was running pkg_add -u after a sysupgrade and
on most of the larger downloads I was getting premature end of file on
archive and other networking issues and generally poor performance.
This started around 7am and I stepped away around 9am, then continued
trying around
On 2021-11-29, Why 42? The lists account. wrote:
>
> Well, errors related to the python package ...
>
> After updating to the latest snapshot and rebooting I ran "pkg_add -vu"
> to update all my packages, which I think is the right thing to do.
>
> I noticed some s
Well, errors related to the python package ...
After updating to the latest snapshot and rebooting I ran "pkg_add -vu"
to update all my packages, which I think is the right thing to do.
I noticed some strange errors related to python scroll past i.e.
> ...
> Update candidate
Dear Andrew,
Moved the package out of the directory. Packages are updating. Thank
you.
Pascal.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Andrew Hewus Fresh
Aan: pas...@pascallen.nl
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: After upgrade to 6.9 pkg_add -u throws ListUtil.c error
Datum: Mon, 22 Nov 2021
...@pascallen.nl
Cc: misc@openbsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: After upgrade to 6.9 pkg_add -u throws ListUtil.c error
Datum: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 14:45:19 -0800
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:34:44PM +0100,
pas...@pascallen.nl
wrote:
> After a sysupgrade to 6.9
> I try to update the packages but get thr
On Mon, Nov 22, 2021 at 11:34:44PM +0100, pas...@pascallen.nl wrote:
> After a sysupgrade to 6.9
> I try to update the packages but get thrown an error:
>
> router# pkg_add -Uu
> ListUtil.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
> handshake key 0xb60, neede
After a sysupgrade to 6.9
I try to update the packages but get thrown an error:
router# pkg_add -Uu
ListUtil.c: loadable library and perl binaries are mismatched (got
handshake key 0xb60, needed 0xec0)
How can I recover?
--
Met vriendelijke groet,
Pascal Huisman
Win 98 Psychic
n the
process of pkg_add / sysupgrade / pkg_* while updating OpenBSD
packages.
There doesn't seem a real advantage here.
In terms of checking that files are from a known source, pkg_add checks
signatures with signify (so updates over plain http are OK really).
Also the checks are done wi
On 2021-11-19, Fabio Martins wrote:
> Sorry if it is a bit off-topic.
>
> After reading an article about rogue CA's:
>
> https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/19/web_trust_certificates/
>
> I wonder if there is any advantage of using certificate pinning in the
> pr
n the
process of pkg_add / sysupgrade / pkg_* while updating OpenBSD
packages.
OpenBSD does not use PKI/web of trust for integrity validation, thus I
don't think certificate pinning makes sense for those operations.
Instead, OpenBSD uses signify(1) with pubkeys in /etc/signify/ for that
purpo
Sorry if it is a bit off-topic.
After reading an article about rogue CA's:
https://www.theregister.com/2021/11/19/web_trust_certificates/
I wonder if there is any advantage of using certificate pinning in the
process of pkg_add / sysupgrade / pkg_* while updating OpenBSD packages.
--
Check your system time maybe?
On 11/1/21 18:06, rahul deshmukh wrote:
Hi Team,
while installing new packages i am getting below error.
myhost01$ doas pkg_add rust
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS
handshake failure: ocsp verify failed: ocsp response not
Hi Team,
while installing new packages i am getting below error.
myhost01$ doas pkg_add rust
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages-stable/amd64/: TLS
handshake failure: ocsp verify failed: ocsp response not current
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/7.0/packages/amd64/: TLS handshake
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 10:42:04AM +0900, Yuichiro NAITO wrote:
> Following patch changes pkg_add to return a error code,
> if a package name is wrong.
>
> diff --git a/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
> b/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
> index 7a968cbf05d..39bee874
Following patch changes pkg_add to return a error code,
if a package name is wrong.
diff --git a/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
b/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
index 7a968cbf05d..39bee874ff1 100644
--- a/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD/AddDelete.pm
+++ b/usr.sbin/pkg_add/OpenBSD
Hi, I have a question about exit status of pkg_add command.
When I wrote a package install script which included typo in a package name
(of course it's my fault), the script didn't stop in spite of `set -e`.
Because pkg_add command returns 0 even if a package name is wrong.
Is this e
On 2021-10-15, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> Bingo. I was even told about it in the email I ignored (there's
> nothing wrong with *69):
:) Been there done that. (If I am anywhere near tight on space in /usr
I usually try to upgrade with the "untar on running system" method with a
root shell open so I
Oh and it's also worth noting that despite that massive cock-up,
the box is still (now) running just fine on this frankenhybrid and
serving its git repositories and running its crons, all entirely
hands-off and automated:
# uname -a && uptime
OpenBSD smoke.datum 7.0 GENERIC#224 amd64
4:29AM up 1
Stuart Henderson writes:
> On 2021-10-14, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> > Turns out, one of my less important boxes was still on 6.8. Whoops.
> >
> > After two sysupgrades, this is the result of pkg_add -u:
> >
> > quirks-4.53 signed on 2021-10-12T20:12:39Z
> >
Turns out, one of my less important boxes was still on 6.8. Whoops.
After two sysupgrades, this is the result of pkg_add -u:
quirks-4.53 signed on 2021-10-12T20:12:39Z
Can't install cairo-1.16.0 because of libraries
|library pixman-1.40.0 not found
| /usr/X11R6/lib/libpixman-1.so.38.4 (s
On 2021-10-14, cho...@jtan.com wrote:
> Turns out, one of my less important boxes was still on 6.8. Whoops.
>
> After two sysupgrades, this is the result of pkg_add -u:
>
> quirks-4.53 signed on 2021-10-12T20:12:39Z
> Can't install cairo-1.16.0 because of libraries
>
.us> wrote:
> >>
> >> > On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:53:46PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> >> > > I am running amd64-current from snapshots. I am installing a lot of
> >> > > packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
> >> > >
> &
opescu wrote:
>> > > I am running amd64-current from snapshots. I am installing a lot of
>> > > packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
>> > >
>> > > I got some strange reports, see below. This is the third email about
>> > this,
>> &g
apshots. I am installing a lot of
> > > packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
> > >
> > > I got some strange reports, see below. This is the third email about
> > this,
> > > maybe isn't it a big deal.
> > >
> >
> > pkg_add -Dsn
On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 11:55 PM Chris Bennett <
cpb_m...@bennettconstruction.us> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:53:46PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> > I am running amd64-current from snapshots. I am installing a lot of
> > packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
>
On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 09:53:46PM +0300, Mihai Popescu wrote:
> I am running amd64-current from snapshots. I am installing a lot of
> packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
>
> I got some strange reports, see below. This is the third email about this,
> maybe isn't it a b
I am running amd64-current from snapshots. I am installing a lot of
packages using pkg_add -vV pkg1 pkg2 ...
I got some strange reports, see below. This is the third email about this,
maybe isn't it a big deal.
[output cut]
libreoffice-7.2.1.2v0:postgresql-client-13.4p0: 121/145
libreo
name
avr-0.1p0: 213/214
Old post included:
>
Hello,
I use to run pkg_add with multiple package names, something like:
pkg_add -vV gimp libreoffice geeqie audacity inkscape vlc mupdf
I am sure gimp is ahead of vlc in the command line. I saw something strange
in output:
[ ... ]
gimp-2.10.22p1:aa
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:25:31PM +0100, Björn Gohla wrote:
>
> hi all,
>
> i'm on 6.9 current. installing any package (example below) fails since there
> is
> apparently no 6.9 release directory. what am i doin wrong?
>
> thanks for any hints.
Try again like
hi all,
i'm on 6.9 current. installing any package (example below) fails since there is
apparently no 6.9 release directory. what am i doin wrong?
thanks for any hints.
---
titanic# pkg_add gbc
https://cdn.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/6.9/packages/amd64/: no such dir
Can't find gbc
tita
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 04:56:11PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, li...@y42.org wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What would cause pkg_add -u to report this error?
> >> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: TLS
In gmane.os.openbsd.misc, li...@y42.org wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> What would cause pkg_add -u to report this error?
>> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: TLS handshake
>> failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error: 0
>> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/Op
Hi All,
What would cause pkg_add -u to report this error?
> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: TLS handshake
> failure: ocsp verify failed: Undefined error: 0
> https://ftp.fau.de/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/packages/amd64/: empty
> Couldn't find updates for .
day:
> > >
> > > OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #357: Tue Feb 23 22:09:48 MST 2021
> > > dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> > >
> > > When I run pkg_add -u afterwards, it just sits there, without output,
> > >
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
> >
> > When I run pkg_add -u afterwards, it just sits there, without output,
> > for an unusually long time.
> >
> > With ^T it says: Processing Parameters.
> >
> > After some minutes t
On 2021-02-24, Marcus MERIGHI wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I just ugraded two machines to the snapshot of the day:
>
> OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #357: Tue Feb 23 22:09:48 MST 2021
> dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
>
> When I run pkg_ad
Hello!
I just ugraded two machines to the snapshot of the day:
OpenBSD 6.9-beta (GENERIC.MP) #357: Tue Feb 23 22:09:48 MST 2021
dera...@amd64.openbsd.org:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
When I run pkg_add -u afterwards, it just sits there, without output,
for an unusually long
1 - 100 of 944 matches
Mail list logo
