Re: pf tables and interface groups

2005-10-15 Thread Henning Brauer
* Henning Brauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-12 17:17]: > no, I managed to miss implementing the static expansion, the way more > complicated dynamic expansion for interface groups works fine. I'll add > the static one asap. so here's the diff for that. disclaimer: I hacked that at a conference

Re: pf tables and interface groups

2005-10-12 Thread Henning Brauer
* Ryan Puckett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-10-07 22:36]: > Under the Tables section in the pf.conf(5) man page, it is indicated > that tables can be created with a valid interface group. I'm taking > this to mean I can do the following: > > table { vlan } > > or better yet: > > table { egress }

Re: pf tables and interface groups

2005-10-07 Thread Ryan Puckett
Sorry, should have indicated I'm using OpenBSD version 3.8 dmesg: OpenBSD 3.8-current (GENERIC) #169: Sun Oct 2 15:06:50 MDT 2005 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/i386/compile/GENERIC cpu0: Intel Pentium III ("GenuineIntel" 686-class, 512KB L2 cache) 549 MHz cpu0: FPU,V86,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,P

pf tables and interface groups

2005-10-07 Thread Ryan Puckett
Under the Tables section in the pf.conf(5) man page, it is indicated that tables can be created with a valid interface group. I'm taking this to mean I can do the following: table { vlan } or better yet: table { egress } but when loading up the ruleset or even trying to manually add the tabl