Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread eagirard
Updated. I very rarely install the last couple of years. Tobias Ulmer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote: > > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a > > panic. > > You "installed"? Not "updated"? > > > > > I boote

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread eagirard
> Subject:Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots > From: Theo de Raadt > Date: 2010-10-03 19:24:19 > Message-ID: 201010031924.o93JOJb1029879 () cvs ! openbsd ! org > [Download message RAW] > > > > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday,

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread Miod Vallat
> And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a > bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required, > as the assert says. But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct - it just needs to be recompiled to match the kernel it

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > And even then, since it is code from other people, it still might have a > > bug in it regarding the malloc flags -- either of those is now required, > > as the assert says. > > But remember, the flags value changed. The lkm source might be correct - it might be correct. > it just needs to b

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a > > panic. > > > > I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and > > ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below. > > You are mixing a recent snapshot and an

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Sun, Oct 03, 2010 at 01:35:06PM -0500, eagir...@cox.net wrote: > I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a > panic. You "installed"? Not "updated"? > > I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and > ignored the hash mismatch, and

Re: panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread Miod Vallat
> I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a > panic. > > I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and > ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below. You are mixing a recent snapshot and an lkm which has

panic on 2 October and 3 October snapshots

2010-10-03 Thread eagirard
I installed the 2 October snapshot yesterday, and after the reboot got a panic. I booted again from the RAMdisk kernel, point to the 3 October snaphot and ignored the hash mismatch, and panicked again. Trace and ps for each below. -- Ed Ahlsen-Girard Ft. Walton Beach FL trace for 2 October snap