-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/14 21:44, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * Harald Dunkel [2014-10-07 13:46]:
>> A related question: I wonder how well "(self)" and "(group)" perform,
>> compared to tables listing IP addresses? Is (self) evaluated every time for
>> each rule usi
* Harald Dunkel [2014-10-07 13:46]:
> A related question: I wonder how well "(self)" and "(group)"
> perform, compared to tables listing IP addresses? Is (self)
> evaluated every time for each rule using it, once per connection,
> in certain intervals, or only if one of the network interfaces
> ar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
On 10/07/14 05:12, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote:
> On 04-10-2014 11:06, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>> The parentheses denote potentially dynamic addresses, and IIRC the main
>> difference is that with parentheses the list will be expanded I
On 04-10-2014 11:06, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> The parentheses denote potentially dynamic addresses, and IIRC the
> main difference is that with parentheses the list will be expanded
> IIRC at rule evaluation time, while without the parentheses, the list
> of addresses is expanded at ruleset lo
Harald Dunkel writes:
> Pf question about parentheses around "self": Does "(self)"
> work similar to "(egress)"? pf.conf(5) describes parentheses
> around interface names and interface groups, but "self" is
> not mentioned:
The parentheses denote potentially dynamic addresses, and IIRC the
main
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Hi folks,
Pf question about parentheses around "self": Does "(self)"
work similar to "(egress)"? pf.conf(5) describes parentheses
around interface names and interface groups, but "self" is
not mentioned:
address= ( interface-name | interfac
6 matches
Mail list logo