Sorry my bad these are actually system libraries and not packages missing.
Indeed I do not have X tgz packages installed yet.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On April 16, 2018 3:48 PM, mabi wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like some package dependencies are missing
Do you have the X sets installed? I'm not at my computer but fontconfig sounds
like something that would be in the base x install.
On Apr 16, 2018 8:48 AM, mabi wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> It looks like some package dependencies are missing on the package repository
> of
Hello,
It looks like some package dependencies are missing on the package repository
of 6.3 amd64 or pfstat dependencies is broken. See below:
$ doas pkg_add -v pfstat
quirks-2.414 signed on 2018-03-28T14:24:37Z
quirks-2.414: ok
pfstat-2.5p2:libiconv-1.14p3: ok
pfstat-2.5p2:png-1.6.34: ok
previously on this list Alessandro DE LAURENZIS contributed:
> bear with me... Noob at work!
>
> So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
> messed-up package dependencies.
>
> 2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
> to d
-current completely
> messed-up package dependencies.
>
> 2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
> to delete them all and re-add, but that of course didn't solve
> anything.
>
> Just as an example:
>
>
> just22@poseidon:[~]> pk
> So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
> messed-up package dependencies.
http://www.openbsd.org/faq/current.html
"You should ALWAYS use a snapshot as the starting point for running -current.
Upgrading by compiling your own source code is not suppo
Dear misc@ readers,
bear with me... Noob at work!
So, it seems that upgrading from 5.5-STABLE to -current completely
messed-up package dependencies.
2/3 of previously installed packages were not upgradable; I tried
to delete them all and re-add, but that of course didn't solve
anything.
Sorry about the lack of feedback.
Basically, there are quite a few severe limitations to the way pkg_delete
currently walks dependencies.
Putting a band-aid such as your patch is not going to help, and yeah,
redesigning that to work better is on my list.
I recently submitted a patch to do this. I haven't received much feedback
but check if it works for you.
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129320921012808&w=2
Luis
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dep
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Frank Bax wrote:
> On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
>>
>> I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
>> manually installed packages I deleted.
>
> If you had used "-D dependencies" when you manually deleted a package; the
On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 10:08:09AM -0500, Frank Bax wrote:
> On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
> >I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
> >manually installed packages I deleted.
>
> If you had used "-D dependencies" when you manually deleted a
> pack
On 12/27/10 09:35, Dmitrij D. Czarkoff wrote:
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
If you had used "-D dependencies" when you manually deleted a package;
the dependencies would also be deleted (unless they are requir
Hello!
I use a custom script to remove automaticly installed dependencies to the
manually installed packages I deleted.
AFAIK ``pkg'' doesn't provide this functionality (if I'm wrong, correct me,
please).
The things I wanted to ask are:
1. Is there any reason for this functionality being missin
On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 12:09:05PM +0100, Jan Stary wrote:
> No really, what is the right way to recursively list the
> dependencies of a given package? pkg_info doesn't seem to
> do that natively (and the above attempt only works for
> installed packages indeed). Is that a design decision,
> say b
On Nov 08 09:50:19, Jan Stary wrote:
> On Nov 07 19:21:07, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
> > Jan Stary wrote:
> > > cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
> >
> > Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
> > dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tre
Jan Stary wrote:
> dir=/var/db/pkg/$pkg
Since you use the above mechanism to read the package list,
your script only works for already installed packages.
Srikant.
On Nov 07 19:21:07, srikant@gmail.com wrote:
> Jan Stary wrote:
> > cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
>
> Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
> dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tree
> structure. Recursion is needed if you want to
Jan Stary wrote:
> cat /var/db/pkg/$PACKAGE/+REQUIRING | xargs pkg_info -s
Thats just the first level of dependencies. What about the
dependencies of the dependencies, and so on? It is a tree
structure. Recursion is needed if you want to know the
'real collateral damage' :)
Srikant.
Hi Aaron
On 11/6/09, Aaron Mason wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
>> desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
>> software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
>> alternatives whenever possible.
>>
>> This sc
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
> desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
> software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
> alternatives whenever possible.
>
> This script will help you estimate the total space
> which
On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:42 AM, wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just wanted to share a script with fellow OpenBSD
> desktop users who like to keep minimal non-base
> software on the machine and prefer to use lighter
> alternatives whenever possible.
>
> This script will help you estimate the total space
> which
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 05:57:39PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:00:21PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> >> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
> >> >is there an easy w
Hi!
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 08:00:21PM +0100, Marc Espie wrote:
>On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
>> >is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
>> >dependencies? Scenario is
Dorian Buettner wrote on Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:01:19AM +0100:
> I tried some of the suggested hints, but haven't found for example nspr
> end up in the package cache, some other deps might also be missing,
Did you copy the new system libraries to /usr/lib?
As far as i remember, when pkg_add
Ingo Schwarze schrieb:
Ted Unangst schrieb am Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:16:42PM -0500:
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
P.S.
What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
network access?
off the top of my head: operative phrase poss
Ted Unangst schrieb am Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 05:16:42PM -0500:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>> P.S.
>> What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
>> network access?
> off the top of my head: operative phrase possibly being "right now",
> it can be a
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
> P.S.
> What the heck are you going to do with firefox on a box lacking
> network access?
off the top of my head: operative phrase possibly being "right now",
it can be a real annoyance to have to wait until net access is
available and then in
Hi Dorian,
Dorian Buettner wrote on Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100:
> is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
> dependencies? Scenario is:
> eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
> proceed installing useful things, let's say firef
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:28:57PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> > As far as shared libs go, there's nothing wrong with adding the new shared
> > libs
> > in your soekris /usr/lib: grab base*.tgz xbase*tgz,
> > untar just the *.so.* thingies, and
On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 2:00 PM, Marc Espie wrote:
> As far as shared libs go, there's nothing wrong with adding the new shared
> libs
> in your soekris /usr/lib: grab base*.tgz xbase*tgz,
> untar just the *.so.* thingies, and put them in /usr/lib...
I'd be very cautious doing this, as it makes i
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 02:02:59PM +0100, Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
> >is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
> >dependencies? Scenario is:
> >eee904ha does not have network access at all right now.
On Monday 02 February 2009 13:02:59 Hannah Schroeter wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
> >is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
> >dependencies? Scenario is:
> >eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In orde
Hi!
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B|ttner wrote:
>is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
>dependencies? Scenario is:
>eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
>proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox, I'd like t
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009, BadMagic wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B?ttner wrote:
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, l
On Sun, Feb 01, 2009 at 02:01:03PM +0100, Dorian B?ttner wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
> dependencies? Scenario is:
> eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
> proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox
Hi all,
is there an easy way to fetch a package along with it's recursive
dependencies? Scenario is:
eee904ha does not have network access at all right now. In order to
proceed installing useful things, let's say firefox, I'd like to suck
packages onto a usb stick and installl from there.
I th
On 2006/06/19 11:34, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> This has been covered over and over in the archives, but some
> highlights:
>
> fvwmthe default, in base: this is not the newest version, as
> fvwm switched to GPL. It's quite usable.
It's also lighter on system resources than some people mi
On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:24:24PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> On 17 Jun 2006, at 11:24, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>
> >On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> >>quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
> >>
> >>If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a
On 17 Jun 2006, at 11:24, Joachim Schipper wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
argu
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
>
> If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
> the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
> arguments sake?
>
> Many thanks
>
> poncen
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 12:34:47PM +0200, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
> > > Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
> > > it, but it didn't work (and doe
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:20:44AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
> > Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
> > it, but it didn't work (and doesn't), do I need a special -F flag?
> >
> > setenv PKG_PATH $OBSD_FTP/snap
On 2006/06/17 11:38, Bihlmaier Andreas wrote:
> Could you elaborate on this, since that was my first thought how to do
> it, but it didn't work (and doesn't), do I need a special -F flag?
>
> setenv PKG_PATH $OBSD_FTP/snapshots/packages/i386/
> setenv PKG_CACHE $HOME
>
> Results in:
> /usr/sbin/p
On Sat, Jun 17, 2006 at 11:15:59AM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> > p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> > download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
> > system running gnome, when
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
> system running gnome, when said system has no connection to the interweb
Just use pkg_add !
On 6/16/06, Bihlmaier Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> > download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable deskto
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 04:19:26PM -0700, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> > download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
> > system running gnome, when said system has no co
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
> system running gnome, when said system has no connection to
> the interweb
See also: 'make print-build-depends' and 'make pri
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a
> list of
> the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
> arguments sake?
$ cd /usr/ports/x11/gnome/desktop/
$ make describe
gnome-desktop-2.10.2p1|x11/gnome/desktop||components for the G
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:47:40PM +0100, poncenby wrote:
> p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
> download and burn to CD in order to get a reasonably usable desktop
> system running gnome, when said system has no connection to the interweb
>
If the net wont c
quick one for you knowledgeable chaps/chapesses...
If one does not have OpenBSD installed how would one obtain a list of
the dependencies of a certain package, say gnome-desktop for
arguments sake?
Many thanks
poncenby
p.s. this question comes from the need to know the exact packages to
51 matches
Mail list logo
