Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-19 Thread Eric Furman
ble higher > > than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of pf in FreeBSD. > > > > Is there also a SMP support (intended) in OpenBSD? > > > > Regards > > > > Alex > > > > > > > > -- > > View this message in

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-19 Thread Uwe Werler
n FreeBSD. > > Is there also a SMP support (intended) in OpenBSD? > > Regards > > Alex > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095.html > Sent from the openbsd

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-18 Thread Adam Thompson
On 16-04-16 11:55 AM, Mihai Popescu wrote: Hi, beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i use pf. I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of pf in FreeBSD. I would point yo

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-17 Thread Rick Hanson
> hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: > a) SMP of network stack/pf. > b) a modern file system like ZFS or Hammer. Yay! I just won a bet (from a friend of mine) that this was going to turn into a troll. Thanks for the confirmation, dude! (My friend is not happy with you, thou

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-17 Thread Mihai Popescu
> So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ? You can write the code for SMP, test and compile it at home, then send it to the project for commit. The other way is sponsor someone to write it. > hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: > a) SMP of network

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-17 Thread bluesun08
hmm ... in the end i see two big "problems" of OpenBSD: a) SMP of network stack/pf. b) a modern file system like ZFS or Hammer. -- View this message in context: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095p294143.html Sent from the openbsd u

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-16 Thread Philip Guenther
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 5:10 AM, bluesun08 wrote: > beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i > use pf. > I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher > than in OpenBSD. I think that is due to the SMP-support of pf in FreeBSD. > > Is

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-16 Thread Mike Burns
On 2016-04-16 12.57.56 -0700, bluesun08 wrote: > So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ? Be sure to run a MP kernel. You can verify with: dmesg | grep MP To track progress so you know where to help, search tech@ for "unlock": http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&w=2&r=1&

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-16 Thread bluesun08
So, please can you say me how to activate SMP pf support in OpenBSD ? -- View this message in context: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095p294121.html Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-16 Thread Mihai Popescu
> Hi, > beside OpenBSD 5.8 i installed FreeBSD 10.3 on my router-pc. For routing i > use pf. Pf has not very much to do with routing, as I remembeer. Can you give more details? > I noticed that the routing/NAT-performance is in FreeBSD noticeable higher > than in OpenBSD. How did you test? The

openbsd vs freebsd NAT performance

2016-04-16 Thread bluesun08
Alex -- View this message in context: http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/openbsd-vs-freebsd-NAT-performance-tp294095.html Sent from the openbsd user - misc mailing list archive at Nabble.com.