ummm
actually, the Windows layer of Win98 could handle 256 chars for a filename
- the DOS layer underneath was still limited
r
At 09:31 AM 17/06/2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I've a question related to newfs_msdos.
>
>I bought a USB-Stick and formated it (FAT32) but I'm still limited to the
>
On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 01:31:05AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I've a question related to newfs_msdos.
>
> I bought a USB-Stick and formated it (FAT32) but I'm still limited to the
> 8.3 DOS-Style for the filenames.
>
> Maybe I'm wrong but MS Windows 98 wich was able to use FAT32 was able t
Is this, from mount_msdos(8), relevant at all:?
-l Force listing and generation of Windows 95/98 long
filenames and
separate creation/modification/access dates.
If neither -s nor -l are given, mount_msdos searches the
root di-
rectory of the filesy
I've a question related to newfs_msdos.
I bought a USB-Stick and formated it (FAT32) but I'm still limited to the
8.3 DOS-Style for the filenames.
Maybe I'm wrong but MS Windows 98 wich was able to use FAT32 was able to
use 256 CHarackters for a filename
So I got many ~ in my filenames and a
4 matches
Mail list logo
