While harmless it seesm pointless to create a filesystem that generates
warnings when fsck'd.
So check for -1 (an allowed value) in FSFree and FSNext fields, and
set FSNext to -1 in newfs_msdos, rather than setting it to a
value sure to be not a free cluster.
Anybody know of reasons to not do thi
Neither field is required. 'Free Space' in fsinfo can be -1 or just wrong,
and 'Next Free Cluster' is a hint only. Hence in either case you can fix
them up, or ignore their incorrectness and the filesystem is still
considered ok.
And since they are not required I guess newfs never bothered to fil
Hello,
a filesystem created by newfs_msdos(8) is reported as faulty by
fsck_msdos(8). And it is indeed. Repeatable. There must be something
wrong. The media itself (a USB flash drive) doesn't have any issues.
# newfs -t msdos /dev/rsd4i
/dev/rsd4i: 31224352 sectors in 3903044 FAT32 clusters
3 matches
Mail list logo
