On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 06:44:34AM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote:
> obviously you show the code, and then when the complexity/simplicity of it
> is seen, some people can jump in and help.
>
> that is the traditional way: show it
>
> >
> > --
> > A: Because it messes up the order in which people no
This was added to GENERIC:
sel* at acpi?
and these four lines were added to files.acpi:
# SEL embedded controller
device sel
attach sel at acpi with sel_acpi
file dev/acpi/sel_acpi.c sel_acpi
With SEL0002 being the first item in the array, shouldn't it at least
match it if it exists? We will add
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:32:34PM -0500, Chase Davis wrote:
> Mike,
>
> We took your suggestion and re-wrote the driver to model sdhc_acpi. I
> have attached the new code. However, the match function never returns
> a 1. We put temporary print statements in the match routine. It is
> being called
Mike,
We took your suggestion and re-wrote the driver to model sdhc_acpi. I
have attached the new code. However, the match function never returns
a 1. We put temporary print statements in the match routine. It is
being called several times during the kernel boot process, but it
never finds a devic
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/04/28 08:56, stan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
> > > sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inli
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 03:22:15PM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016-04-28, stan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> On 2016/04/28 08:56, stan wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> >> > > Stan, can you
On 2016-04-28, stan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> On 2016/04/28 08:56, stan wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>> > > Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
>> > > sendbug -P as root?
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:18:25PM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2016/04/28 08:56, stan wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > > Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
> > > sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inli
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
> sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inline in a
> reply-to-all to this mail would be fine. Please add "sysctl hw"
> output as well. Ideally we want a way
On 2016/04/28 08:56, stan wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> > Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
> > sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inline in a
> > reply-to-all to this mail would be fine. Please add "sysctl hw
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 08:44:49AM +0100, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
> sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inline in a
> reply-to-all to this mail would be fine. Please add "sysctl hw"
> output as well. Ideally we want a way
Stan, can you send the information that is output when you run
sendbug -P as root? Just putting the whole thing inline in a
reply-to-all to this mail would be fine. Please add "sysctl hw"
output as well. Ideally we want a way to identify the watchdog
itself rather than the general machine type etc.
Davis
>
> From: stan
> To: Stuart Henderson
> Subject: Re: FW: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware
> Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:57:48 -0400
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
> X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
> X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23
> X-Uptime: 11:51:45 up 91 days, 10
On 2016-04-26, Theo de Raadt wrote:
>> int
>> selwd_probe(struct device *parent, void *match, void *aux)
>> {
>> struct isa_attach_args *ia = aux;
>> bus_space_tag_t iot;
>> bus_space_handle_t ioh;
>>
>> /* Match by device ID */
>> iot = ia->ia_iot;
>> if (bus_space_
- Forwarded message from stan -
From: stan
To: Theo de Raadt
Subject: Re: watchdog suport for new hardware
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 09:19:20 -0400
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux
X-Kernel-Version: 2.4.23
X-Uptime: 09:17:17 up 91 days, 8:18, 1 user, load
> int
> selwd_probe(struct device *parent, void *match, void *aux)
> {
> struct isa_attach_args *ia = aux;
> bus_space_tag_t iot;
> bus_space_handle_t ioh;
>
> /* Match by device ID */
> iot = ia->ia_iot;
> if (bus_space_map(iot, ia->ipa_io[0].base, SELWD_IOSIZE
obviously you show the code, and then when the complexity/simplicity of it
is seen, some people can jump in and help.
that is the traditional way: show it
> We are embarking on a project where we will be using a number of
> industrially hardened computers manufactured by Schweitzer Engineering
>
We are embarking on a project where we will be using a number of
industrially hardened computers manufactured by Schweitzer Engineering
Laboratories, Inc. (SEL). SEL provides a very well whiten document
describing certain special features of these computers. One of these is a
hardware watchdog.
If you have new hardware and would like to run OpenBSD on it, send in your
dmesgs and device dumps to dmesg@. Developers don't always have access to the
latest stuff, so it helps to know what works and what doesn't. Bug reports
go to the public bugs@ list.
Set $model to something spec
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 18:51:58 + (UTC), Doros Eracledes wrote:
>We had very good results with SuperMicro machines with the X9SCi-LN4
>motherboard. It comes with 4 x Integrated Intel 82574 L Gigabit LAN Ports so
>with an additional Intel Quad card we get 8 ports in total.
>the CPU we get is the
On Thu, 3 Apr 2014 12:21:59 + (UTC), Stuart Henderson wrote:
>I should be getting a supermicro A1SAi-2550F box from a system builder to
>test in a week or so, which covers most of this while using less power.
>4 ports onboard and a PCIe slot so you could add a quad nic (though for
>my intended
100Mbit/s ipsec throughput.
Cheers
Doros
- Original Message -
> From: "Rod Whitworth"
> To: "Miscellaneous OBSD"
> Sent: Thursday, 3 April, 2014 2:26:27 AM
> Subject: New hardware for BGPd
>
> I've been running a couple of Soekris 5501s with a
On 2014-04-03, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> I've been running a couple of Soekris 5501s with an add-in 4-port
> network card.
>
> We are looking to upgrade and I need to get a clue about suitable
> hardware.
>
> Google is, these days, totally crap for searching things like what I
> need and I'm sure the
I've been running a couple of Soekris 5501s with an add-in 4-port
network card.
We are looking to upgrade and I need to get a clue about suitable
hardware.
Google is, these days, totally crap for searching things like what I
need and I'm sure there is more than one bit of kit that is running
Open
> Laptop batteries area planned to have a 1-2 year life, and some
> times you get less some times you get more, I have one Thinkpad that the
> battery lasted about 6 months and wont hold a charge, I have another
> that is 5 years old.
Yeah. It drives me mad. My thinkpad has 5 hours in console mod
Hi,
After contemplating for sometime between buying a Zaurus C3100 and a
HPC jazjar/universal (aka Qtek 9000, i-mate, O2 XDA Exec, T-Mobile
MDA IV etc), to satisify my requirement for mobile remote
administration needs etc. I decided to go with the Jazjar, and try to
live with MS windows
26 matches
Mail list logo
