On 2006/09/04 13:25, Bill Marquette wrote:
> More or less :) I can certainly continue to live with em(4), but I'm
> definitely seeing some bottlenecks (interrupt load) with it on my
> hardware (HP DL380 G4's - I have some new DL385's in that I haven't
> benchmarked) w/ i386 non-MP kernel
sk(4) ca
On 9/4/06, Matthew R. Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:30:13AM +, Marcus Popp wrote:
> On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> > Other than Intel, is anyone else making quad port gig cards?
>
> Silicom makes em-based quad/six port cards.
I thought the point
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:30:13AM +, Marcus Popp wrote:
> On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> > Other than Intel, is anyone else making quad port gig cards?
>
> Silicom makes em-based quad/six port cards.
I thought the point of this subthread was Bill trying to avoid
em(4)-based card
thus Marcus Popp spake:
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
the time. However, after I've read about th
thus Marcus Popp spake:
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
the time. However, after I've read about th
On 2006-09-03T23:16, Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
> >> the time. However, after I've read about them at this lis
On 9/3/06, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
> the time. However, after I've read about them at this list & usenet
> for the last few months I had to stan
On 9/3/06, Sylwester S. Biernacki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I use Intel cards for several years and was happy of them almost all
the time. However, after I've read about them at this list & usenet
for the last few months I had to stand up and throw away all of
them.
Theo wrote about e
On Sep 3, 2006, at 6:16 PM, Matthew R. Dempsky wrote:
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Theo wrote about em driver in OpenBSD and bad vendor design of
Intel
NICs in general. Exactly the opposite I have use
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 05:00:37PM -0700, Ray Percival wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
> > Theo wrote about em driver in OpenBSD and bad vendor design of Intel
> > NICs in general. Exactly the opposite I have used Intel server cards
> > with ~320Mbps traffic (m
On Sep 3, 2006, at 3:59 PM, Sylwester S. Biernacki wrote:
Theo wrote about em driver in OpenBSD and bad vendor design of Intel
NICs in general. Exactly the opposite I have used Intel server cards
with ~320Mbps traffic (max of old PCI board ;P) and everything
worked
as it should.
I
11 matches
Mail list logo
