Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Steve Shockley
Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: This hack already exist. AFAIK, delegate http://www.delegate.org, can do this. Be careful what you wish for! He finally got around to checking for string buffer overflows in December 2004: http://www.delegate.org/mail-lists/delegate-en/2793 DeleGate has a reputat

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Giancarlo Razzolini
Joachim Schipper wrote: > > It appears an interesting hack would be possible here, in the form of a > proxy that recognizes both DNS and SSH (which are both pretty easy to > recognize, IIRC), and proxies the connection to the proper daemon. > > Of course, this is a cludge, too, but at least it's mo

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Joachim Schipper
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 04:07:25PM +0100, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient > wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this > port without any authentication. :) > > (Yes, there is not even a need

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Dave Anderson
** Reply to message from "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100 >Hello, > >I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient >wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this >port without any authentication. :) > >(Ye

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2006/06/20 10:53, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > "Dan Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Correct me if I'm wrong (and I usually am) but I thought DNS (and named > > specifically) only used tcp connections for zone transfers. > > Last time I looked named used TCP any time a packet needed

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Tobias Ulmer
On Tue, Jun 20, 2006 at 10:53:00AM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote: > "Dan Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Correct me if I'm wrong (and I usually am) but I thought DNS (and named > > specifically) only used tcp connections for zone transfers. > > Last time I looked named used TCP any

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
"Dan Farrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Correct me if I'm wrong (and I usually am) but I thought DNS (and named > specifically) only used tcp connections for zone transfers. Last time I looked named used TCP any time a packet needed to be fragmented due to size. It is highly unlikely that th

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Spruell, Darren-Perot
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > The machine in question doesn't run pf, and the DSL router > that it is > > connected to doesn't have the option to change ports... :( > > > > So I'd like to settle this with named alone. :) > > > > Thanks, > > Constantine. > > > Correct me if I'm wrong (and I usua

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Dan Farrell
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Constantine A. Murenin > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 11:44 AM > To: Gilles Chehade > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Subject: Re: named on udp ports only > > On 20/06/06, Gille

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:28:28 +0100 "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100 > > "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:28:28 +0100 "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100 > > "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm running an sshd on port 53

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
On 20/06/06, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100 "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient > wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this >

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Steve Shockley
Constantine A. Murenin wrote: How do I tell my named(8) to only listen on udp ports, and leave tcp ports for sshd(8)? Is this at all possible with named.conf alone? I've glanced through named.conf(5), but didn't find the desired option there... If you can't do it with named, you could use pf to

Re: named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Tue, 20 Jun 2006 16:07:25 +0100 "Constantine A. Murenin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient > wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this > port without any authentication. :) > > (Yes, there is

named on udp ports only

2006-06-20 Thread Constantine A. Murenin
Hello, I'm running an sshd on port 53 (domain) as there is some convenient wireless hot-spot that allows for both udp and tcp connection on this port without any authentication. :) (Yes, there is not even a need for NSTX!) How do I tell my named(8) to only listen on udp ports, and leave tcp por