Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) dixit:
>On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:25:02PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>> ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs
>
> Sure, but to be fair, if he cares about his data, it's probably a bad idea
>to try a 3-years old version of e2fsprogs
I don't know which version is in OpenBSD po
Haluk Durmus wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /sbin/fsck.ext2 -y /dev/sda1
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
/dev/sda1: clean, 379761/9781248 files, 18008327/19537040 blocks
No errors war found !
after that I did a fsck on OpenBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# fsck_ext2fs /dev/sd0i
** /dev/rsd0i
** File syst
Now its working :)
I went to an linux pc and did an fsck on linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# /sbin/fsck.ext2 -y /dev/sda1
e2fsck 1.35 (28-Feb-2004)
/dev/sda1: clean, 379761/9781248 files, 18008327/19537040 blocks
No errors war found !
after that I did a fsck on OpenBSD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# fsck_ex
Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) wrote:
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, ext3fs is
not supported.
ext3 is mostly ext2 with an extra inode to handle the journal.
You can usually mount the partition as
Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
>> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, ext3fs is
>> not supported.
>
> ext3 is mostly ext2 with an extra inode to handle the journal.
> You can usually mount the parti
On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 03:25:02PM +, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs
Sure, but to be fair, if he cares about his data, it's probably a bad idea
to try a 3-years old version of e2fsprogs on a platform that the software
was almost never tested on and that refused to mount th
Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One) dixit:
> While running Linux, try
ports/sysutils/e2fsprogs
//mirabile
--
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consi
Rogier Krieger wrote:
> Haluk Durmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It is a 80gig extern harddisk connected with usb2.0 to my laptop.
> > It has an ext3fs and is full of data.
> >
> > I thought,that I could mount it with ext2fs, but it was not
> > posible...
>
> Feel free to correct me if I'm wro
On 30/05/2005, at 9:00 AM, Rogier Krieger wrote:
Digging through the misc@ archives, I get the same impression. That
would mean you're out of luck until you have a chance to convert the
ext3fs filesystem into an ext2fs one.
On a Linux machine it's perfectly possible to mount an ext3
filesyst
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 11:00:34PM +0200, Rogier Krieger wrote:
> Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, ext3fs is
> not supported.
ext3 is mostly ext2 with an extra inode to handle the journal.
You can usually mount the partition as ext3 or ext2 without any special
tweak.
On 5/29/05, Haluk Durmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a 80gig extern harddisk connected with usb2.0 to my laptop.
> It has an ext3fs and is full of data.
>
> I thought,that I could mount it with ext2fs, but it was not posible...
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but as far as I know, ex
I tried an snapshot kernel:
-r--r--r-- 1 root root 5177338 May 27 16:56 bsd
same problems ...
thanks
Haluk Durmus
On Sun, 29 May 2005 16:31:08 +0100
"Niall O'Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:58:16PM +0200, Haluk Durmus wrote:
> > Was it sufficiend that I did an
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 04:58:16PM +0200, Haluk Durmus wrote:
> Was it sufficiend that I did an cvs update on current tree, before kompiling ?
Could you just use a binary snapshot please? That way we bypass all
this nonsense.
Was it sufficiend that I did an cvs update on current tree, before kompiling ?
On Sun, 29 May 2005 14:05:20 +0100
"Niall O'Higgins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Support for ext2fs filesystems with large files was added after 3.7.
> Please try a snapshot, it should work there.
>
> On Sun, May 29,
ps.
It is possible to do an dd if=/dev/sd0i of=/dev/null
On Sun, 29 May 2005 00:37:18 +0200
Haluk Durmus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> since 2 week's I changed from linux to openbsd.
> But my extern hd didn't managed it yet.
>
> It is a 80gig extern harddisk connected with usb2.0 to m
Ok I recompiled with "option EXT2FS_SYSTEM_FLAGS" /usr/src/sys/conf/GENERIC
no changes ...
before I compiled the kernel, I did a "cvs update" on "/usr/src", to get the
current tree
On Sun, 29 May 2005 10:17:02 +0200
"Frank Denis (Jedi/Sector One)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, May 29,
Support for ext2fs filesystems with large files was added after 3.7.
Please try a snapshot, it should work there.
On Sun, May 29, 2005 at 12:37:18AM +0200, Haluk Durmus wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# fsck_ext2fs -d /dev/sd0i
> ** /dev/rsd0i
> compat 0x0004, incompat 0x0006, compat_ro 0x
Hello,
since 2 week's I changed from linux to openbsd.
But my extern hd didn't managed it yet.
It is a 80gig extern harddisk connected with usb2.0 to my laptop.
It has an ext3fs and is full of data.
I thought,that I could mount it with ext2fs, but it was not posible...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# mou
18 matches
Mail list logo
