Henning Brauer wrote:
* jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
I'm a little late to this one, but I've been using it for testing VPN
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:27:48 +0100 "Stephan A. Rickauer"
wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:14 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > * jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
> > > so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
> >
> > it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
> > if anybody is
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 4:27 PM, Stephan A. Rickauer
wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:14 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
>> * jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
>> > so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
>>
>> it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
>> if anybody is actually us
On Sat, 2009-03-21 at 12:14 +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> * jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
> > so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
>
> it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
> if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
Once in a while a re-spot this
Henning Brauer wrote:
> * jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
>> so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
>
> it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
> if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
PF is one of the main factors for me to use OpenBSD, but since I do
On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 12:14:44PM +0100, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
>
> it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
> if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
I used it once about two years ago, to simulate a bad
* jmc [2009-03-11 15:05]:
> so anyway, how are _you_ using probability?
it's high on my list of useless features in pf I'd rather remove.
if anybody is actually using it, I'd like to hear about it.
--
Henning Brauer, h...@bsws.de, henn...@openbsd.org
BS Web Services, http://bsws.de
Full-Service
--- Artur Grabowski [Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 01:13:10PM +0100]: ---
> jmc writes:
>
> > block in log quick on $ext_if from to any probability 90%
> >
> > is because it seems a little bofh-ly to me. and i guess it borders on
> > security-through obscurity, which of course it not really security at
jmc writes:
> block in log quick on $ext_if from to any probability 90%
>
> is because it seems a little bofh-ly to me. and i guess it borders on
> security-through obscurity, which of course it not really security at
> all. but it seems a bit more sinister than just outright blocking, which
> k
--- Jeffrey 'jf' Lim [Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:09:19PM +0800]: ---
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:01 PM, jmc wrote:
> > i say this might be slightly OT because i am asking more of a
> > philosophical question, not a technical one. the excellent documentation
> > has given me all i need to know about
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 10:01 PM, jmc wrote:
> i say this might be slightly OT because i am asking more of a
> philosophical question, not a technical one. the excellent documentation
> has given me all i need to know about the probability directive. thanks,
> devs, for that.
>
(just as a "hint"
i say this might be slightly OT because i am asking more of a
philosophical question, not a technical one. the excellent documentation
has given me all i need to know about the probability directive. thanks,
devs, for that.
quick story: i have a couple dozen websites spread across two
OpenBSD/base
12 matches
Mail list logo
