On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:57:06AM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> machine hangs and such. you will figure out if you're affected or not
> pretty quickly. :) cause unknown.
Good to know. I'll try it out and see what happens. Thanks.
Bryan
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 21:33, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
>> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
>> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
>> configured line is all you'll see
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
> configured line is all you'll see.
Thanks for the clarification. I wasn't aware of that. What
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 10:16:05PM -0500, Ted Unangst wrote:
> The ipmi driver is disabled by default because it does bad things on
> some systems. If you don't go out of your way to enable it, the not
> configured line is all you'll see.
That's what I was going to say, but you beat me to it ;).
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 18:59, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> (running 5.4, by the way). The ipmi(4) driver shows up in my dmesg but
> as:
>
> ipmi at mainbus0 not configured
>
> A few years back I had an X7SPA-HF or similar board in the barebones
> system you can buy but I don't have a dmesg from i
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 05:38:33PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I managed to escalate the integrated graphics question high enough to
> find somebody who knew what they were talking about, he said, as you
> confirmed, that they work fine with this motherboard other than that
> you cannot use the
> From: 'Bryan Vyhmeister' [mailto:br...@bsdjournal.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:51 PM
>
> Very interesting. There is some ambiguity in the specs. Looking at the
> SC510L-200B chassis which is what's included with the SYS-5017C-LF
> system you linked to, it also says 65W TDP.
Well,
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 01:31:23PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> Hmm, I guess I was actually looking at the SuperServer 5017C-LF page:
>
> http://www.supermicro.com/products/system/1U/5017/SYS-5017C-LF.cfm
>
> It has the X9SCL-F motherboard, a similar chassis with a 200w power supply,
> and indi
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:35:35PM -0800, 'Bryan Vyhmeister' wrote:
> From looking at Supermicro's CSE-510-203B page, it says 65W TDP and
> every CPU I've mentioned below except for the Xeon E3 1220 (80W) and
> Xeon E3 1230v2 (69W) fall below this.
Hmm, I guess I was actually looking at the Super
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 12:26:49PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> With the 200W power supply in the small form factor chassis,
> supermicro says the max processor TDP supported by the motherboard is
> 45w. I guess if you put one in that potentially uses greater power but
> never push it to do so it
> From: Stuart Henderson
> Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:54 AM
>
> One thing to note, which may be irrelevant, but may be very important,
> is which CPUs support AES-NI - the LGA1155 Pentium/i3 don't.
Yeah, you've got to bump up to a much more expensive Xeon to get that :(.
Thanks for the h
> From: Bryan Vyhmeister [mailto:br...@bsdjournal.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 9:46 PM
>
> I have lots of X9SCL-F, X9SCL+-F, X9SCM-F, X9SCI-LN4, X9SCI-LN4F,
> X9SCM-iiF boards running OpenBSD in production. Both network interfaces
> work flawlessly.
Cool, thanks much for the info.
> Al
On 2013-11-20, Bryan Vyhmeister wrote:
> You'll have no issues at all. It's a great combination. I tell my
> customers and everyone else to just go with an X9SC{L,M} board, an
> LGA1155 Pentium, Core i3, or Xeon E3 (if absolutely necessary) and be
> done with it. The cheaper Pentium chips and Core
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 07:45:46PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I'm looking at the supermicro X9SCL-F motherboard which has an Intel
> C202 PCH chipset and 2 gigabit interfaces (Intel 82579LM and 82574L),
> combined with a Core i3-3220T, stuffed in a 510T-203B chassis.
I have lots of X9SCL-F, X9
I was recently looking for a low-power small form factor box and was
initially thinking of the supermicro SuperServer 5017A-EF, which seemed a
good fit. Unfortunately, the fairly new atom SoC in that box isn't currently
supported, nor is the crappy "not-quite-AHCI" Marvell sata controller. So,
I'm
15 matches
Mail list logo
