>From the documentaion I tend to agree with this reasoning:
> At first glance, ipsec.conf appears to marginalize the need for
> isakmpd.conf, simplifying the flow definitions. The syntax is very
> easy and resembles the linguistic format we've come to love in pf.conf.
I'm not sure if the isakmpd.
On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 11:41 -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> At first glance, ipsec.conf appears to marginalize the need for
> isakmpd.conf, simplifying the flow definitions. The syntax is very
> easy and resembles the linguistic format we've come to love in pf.conf.
I suppose for using ike withi
On Sep 14, 2005, at 11:30 AM, Tamas TEVESZ wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
Incidentally, something I hadn't noticed before was the updates to
the IPsec
control framwork - this looks terribly exciting as well. ;)
actually, now that we are on the subject, i don't rea
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Spruell, Darren-Perot wrote:
> Incidentally, something I hadn't noticed before was the updates to the IPsec
> control framwork - this looks terribly exciting as well. ;)
actually, now that we are on the subject, i don't really understand
the relation between ipsecadm and ip
4 matches
Mail list logo
