> From: Ted Unangst
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:50 PM
>
> i'm afraid i won't make a very good ipmi maintainer, but i think i applied the
> patch in the right spot.
Cool, thanks; much appreciated.
> From: Theo de Raadt
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 8:41 PM
>
> If you want it working, you will need to get it fixed. On all
> machines, so that we can renable it.
I definitely don't want to be one of those entitled people demanding work
from developers without providing anything that you tr
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> After applying this and installing the resulting kernel, ipmi worked
> fine. I skipped 6.0, but just updated my boxes to 6.1, and see the same
> ipmi failures. It looks like this fix hasn't been applied, the code in
> head is still missing this line. I applied it again to my
> Anyway, thanks for the thoughts; but I do still want a working ipmi :).
> No biggie to add one line and recompile the kernel, but it would be nice
> to get fixed. It's still disabled by default out of the box, you have to
> explicitly reconfigure your kernel to enable it.
If you want it working,
On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 06:31:34PM -0400, Predrag Punosevac wrote:
> My understanding is that ipmi driver used by ipmitool is disabled
> intensionally due to the security problems. IPMI pose a grave security
> risk.
IPMI on the SP is available whether or not the openbsd driver is enabled
or in us
Paul B. Henson wrote:
> I noticed back when I upgraded to 5.9 the ipmi driver stopped working,
> it just said:
>
> ipmi0: get header fails
> ipmi0: no SDRs IPMI disabled
>
> I found the following post at the time which appeared to point out the
> issue and suggest a fix:
>
> http://openbsd-arch
I noticed back when I upgraded to 5.9 the ipmi driver stopped working,
it just said:
ipmi0: get header fails
ipmi0: no SDRs IPMI disabled
I found the following post at the time which appeared to point out the
issue and suggest a fix:
http://openbsd-archive.7691.n7.nabble.com/fix-for-quot-ipmi0-g
7 matches
Mail list logo