Daniel Ouellet wrote:
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much ot
Jonathan Gray wrote:
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
A bit more. Looking in logs, etc. I found this:
nfe0: tx v2 error 0x6004
Searching on google didn't bring much other then a problem that
SX looks plain wrong anyway. Can you provide a dmesg? This is perhaps
related to the phy that attaches to nfe rather than nfe itself.
Sure, here is one of them.
OpenBSD 4.2 (GENERIC.MP) #1378: Tue Aug 28 10:48:58 MDT 2007
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/src/sys/arch/amd64/compile/GENERIC.MP
real m
Here is more. May be I do not understand the reading, I understand it to
mean for example:
>> media: Ethernet 10baseT (1000baseSX half-duplex)
Would be hard configuration to be 10mb half-duplex and then the (xx)
would show what is actually in use.
Isn't this correct?
I may be confuse, but t
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:05:35PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking on the man page, the ifconfig is suppose to show the stage of the
> network cards, and it can't show the proper configuration on the nfe cards,
> even if I force the configuration to fix value, I always get the same
Hi,
Looking on the man page, the ifconfig is suppose to show the stage of
the network cards, and it can't show the proper configuration on the nfe
cards, even if I force the configuration to fix value, I always get the
same results:
nfe0: flags=8843 mtu 1500
lladdr 00:14:4f:7d:91:ea
6 matches
Mail list logo
