Re: i386: fxp & re: both not 1000baseT by default

2007-12-17 Thread vladas
On Dec 16, 2007 3:13 PM, Darren Spruell wrote: > Verify the settings on your switch port that re0 connects to and > verify you've got nothing but autonegotiation selected. If you've got > an unmanaged/unmanageable switch, that should certainly be the case. > If it's manageable, at least see if you

Re: i386: fxp & re: both not 1000baseT by default

2007-12-16 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/12/16 12:22, vladas wrote: > bge0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT full-duplex,rxpause,txpause) > inet 192.168.11.10 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.11.255 > re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX full-duplex,rxpau

Re: i386: fxp & re: both not 1000baseT by default

2007-12-15 Thread Darren Spruell
On Dec 15, 2007 8:22 PM, vladas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Should not both - fxp0 and re0 - autoselect 1000baseT by > default by the dhclient? Both are connected to the same 1000M switch, > no other tweaks in GENERIC's setup: > re0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > lladdr 00:16:01:3d:7f:a6 >

i386: fxp & re: both not 1000baseT by default

2007-12-15 Thread vladas
Hi, Should not both - fxp0 and re0 - autoselect 1000baseT by default by the dhclient? Both are connected to the same 1000M switch, no other tweaks in GENERIC's setup: # cat /etc/hostname* dhcp NONE NONE NONE dhcp NONE NONE NONE lo0: flags=8049 mtu 33208 groups: lo inet6 ::1 prefi