> No really, what could possibly set hw.setperf besides sysctl
> (which I do not call) and apmd (which is not running)? And
> where does the number 5 come from?
>
> Or, what obvious triviality have I overlooked?
> Is hw.setperf meaningless when apm/acpi is disabled?
The kernel is manipulating th
On Dec 02 20:04:18, Jan Stary wrote:
> This is 4.6-stable on a HP EliteBook 8530w (demsg below).
>
> $ sysctl hw.setperf
> hw.setperf=5
>
> I wonder how the 5 got there. I am not setting it;
> acpi is disabled (because boot hangs with acpi enabled),
> apmd is not running.
No really, what could
This is 4.6-stable on a HP EliteBook 8530w (demsg below).
$ sysctl hw.setperf
hw.setperf=5
I wonder how the 5 got there. I am not setting it;
acpi is disabled (because boot hangs with acpi enabled),
apmd is not running.
Note how the kernel is confused (or lied to?) about
the CPU's possible freq
3 matches
Mail list logo
