Re: hoststated/relayd and Linux's tcp_tw_recycle option

2008-04-19 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2008-04-18, Denis Doroshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > google quickly gives a url > > http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6180.shtm > > where it is said "It is likely an artifact of having > tcp_tw_recycle and tcp_tw_reuse enabled in the > sysctl settings." "Work is underway at the moment to

Re: hoststated/relayd and Linux's tcp_tw_recycle option

2008-04-18 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Denis Doroshenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > google quickly gives a url > > http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6180.shtm > > where it is said "It is likely an artifact of having > tcp_tw_recycle and tcp_tw_reuse enabled in the > sysctl settings." Okay? The p

Re: hoststated/relayd and Linux's tcp_tw_recycle option

2008-04-18 Thread Denis Doroshenko
google quickly gives a url http://kbase.redhat.com/faq/FAQ_80_6180.shtm where it is said "It is likely an artifact of having tcp_tw_recycle and tcp_tw_reuse enabled in the sysctl settings." On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 8:08 PM, Matthew Dempsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I setup hoststated earlier t

hoststated/relayd and Linux's tcp_tw_recycle option

2008-04-18 Thread Matthew Dempsky
I setup hoststated earlier this week to provide load balancing and fail over for a few Linux web servers. It went fairly smoothly, except that one of the Linux machines only passed the 'check http "/" code 200' test about 50% of the time. Just using 'check tcp' worked fine, and I saw the same res