On 2006/12/14 21:10, Vim Visual wrote:
> I don't know where is my xorg.conf!
See the 'CONFIGURATION' section and '-configure' command line option
in Xorg(1).
Hi,
I don't know where is my xorg.conf!
locate xorg.conf yields
/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xorg.conf.eg
/usr/X11R6/man/cat5/xorg.conf.0
In /etc/X11/ it's not to find... What is xorg.conf.eg? Is it an
example? Where is reading xorg the configuration for X from??
elachistos% ls /etc/X11/
app-defaults g
Vim Visual wrote:
> Logging as su and without X running I get
>
> 1280pgm 30 1280 768
> Unable to open /dev/mem: Operation not permitted
You must run this before securelevel gets raised.
> 3d 1920 1440 is one mode I don't want to use; you have to overwrite
> one of them like that
> I "guessed"
Hi,
I would be willing to try this but in spite of not being a C
programmer I think this is not the full patch... or is it? Can you
provide me with a file newpatch.c? Or do you expect me to merge this
with the old c patch? this is too much for a fortran programmer...
>
> http://www.jail.se/p70
Hi...
I'm rather stubborn and I've installed o'bsd with an only slice.
It remembers me when I took the decision of removing the windows
partition and only use linux... it has shown to really pay off. i've
learnt a lot. Now it's the turn for o'bsd
I have followed your advice, woodchuck and it co
I've asked him several times now to post the exact problems he is having
using the port. I'm not going to do so again.
hey, Dimitry... I _cannot_ post the problem because I do not have
o'bsd any more on this laptop (with the 855 chipset). That's why I do
not do it.
I cannot reproduce the error
On Wed, 2006-12-13 at 22:19 +0100, Vim Visual wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ok... it's taken me blood and sweat but I have succeeded at resizing
> (per hand) the linux disk without losing data (!). Qtparted just
> didn't work at all.
Qtparted is probably a front-end to Parted, which is yet another GNU
misgrow
Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> I'm might be compleetly wrong, but isn't the 915resolution-0.5.2.tgz
> package what Vim needs? That's already ported, precompiled and tested
> on a variety of harware using that chipset.
I've asked him several times now to post the exact problems he is having
using the port
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Vim Visual wrote:
> ahem...
>
> any C programmer willing to have a look at the C code to make it o'bsd
> compatible? according to Naoki it should be feasible but my
> programming knowledge is limited to shell scripting, a bit of python
> and fortran... (am a Physicist)
>
> h
Hi,
ok... it's taken me blood and sweat but I have succeeded at resizing
(per hand) the linux disk without losing data (!). Qtparted just
didn't work at all. I don't know how but I have managed to have now
three partitions
1st partition, ~35GB, with ext3
2nd partition, ~35GB no format
3rd partit
ahem...
any C programmer willing to have a look at the C code to make it o'bsd
compatible? according to Naoki it should be feasible but my
programming knowledge is limited to shell scripting, a bit of python
and fortran... (am a Physicist)
http://www.jail.se/p7010/1280patch-845g-855gm-865g.c
:)
At Wed, 13 Dec 2006 19:07:24 +0100,
Vim Visual wrote:
> > We would rather have a chance to fix the 915resolution port, if it
> > somehow didn't work on your machine, than try to get some weird
> > Linux-only program running.
>
> it's not weird; it's C and it's not only for Linux... it's working
>
Hi Dimitry,
You should always verify that everything works, before taking any
machine into production. :)
well, I cannot think of a better verification than installing the OS
and look around... googling around for all the system can be rather
tedious
As others have already said, a separate
p
Vim Visual wrote:
> I cannot afford to have a non-functional (I know this is an
> exaggerated statement) production laptop for longer than, say, a few
> hours. As a matter of fact I am reinstalling GNU/Linux right now
> because I HAVE to work this evening (the installation and set up takes
> ~20 mi
Hi there,
On Dec 13, 2006, at 3:09 PM, Vim Visual wrote:
yes... that's probably the solution...
gosh... this means that I have to re-install both things... anyway...
Nonsense! :-) You can make room on your harddrive by resizing some of
your partitions so that OpenBSD fits on it too. All yo
yes... that's probably the solution...
gosh... this means that I have to re-install both things... anyway...
2006/12/13, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Why don't you just set aside a partiton for OpenBSD and dual-boot until
you get your setup to the point that you can work with it?
-Rj
Why don't you just set aside a partiton for OpenBSD and dual-boot until
you get your setup to the point that you can work with it?
-RjH
Hi Dimitry and Gerhard,
first of all i apologise but I really was/am in panic... as I said,
this is my production laptop, the small little toy in front of which I
spend some ~10 hours a day!
I have spent quite a few days to learn the fundamentals of o'bsd on a
crashbox (this one, an ibm t43p) an
Vim Visual wrote:
...
> vga1 at pci0 dev 2 function 0 "Intel 82852GM AGP" rev 0x02: aperture at
> 0xd800, size 0x800
> wsdisplay0 at vga1 mux 1: console (80x25, vt100 emulation)
> wsdisplay0: screen 1-5 added (80x25, vt100 emulation)
> "Intel 82852GM AGP" rev 0x02 at pci0 dev 2 function 1
Hi folks and Naoki,
I have done it... I have installed o'bsd on my production laptop
(fujitsu siemens lifebook p7010) and it seems to work quite nice BUT
for one VERY important thing: screen resolution. It's showing 1024x768
whilst the laptop can reach 1280x768
I was aware of this because in GNU/
20 matches
Mail list logo
