On Tue, 27 Sep 2005, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
> >
> > report, including all details.
> >
> > -Otto
>
> I would file a bug report, if you tell me what more information I could give
> than I already did?
>
> It worked until a
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 10:29:37AM +0200, Otto Moerbeek wrote:
>
> On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
>
> > > > I have exactly the same issue on amd64 & i386 since two weeks ago,
> > > > gphoto2 worked like a charm before, now I have to set up a 3.7 machine
> > > > only so I can get pi
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 03:19:42PM +0300, Antti Nykdnen wrote:
> On 2005-09-26 at 10:19, Marc Espie wrote:
> > It's very likely to be an out-of-bounds access somewhere...
> > fixing this just means some developer needs to reproduce it and track it
> > down. No digital camera around here right now.
On 2005-09-26 at 10:19, Marc Espie wrote:
> It's very likely to be an out-of-bounds access somewhere...
> fixing this just means some developer needs to reproduce it and track it
> down. No digital camera around here right now.
It works with -rOPENBSD_3_8 ld.so, btw. Maybe some of the recent chang
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> > > I have exactly the same issue on amd64 & i386 since two weeks ago,
> > > gphoto2 worked like a charm before, now I have to set up a 3.7 machine
> > > only so I can get pictures from my camera :(
> > >
> > > Will it be fixed until 3.8 ? I would r
On Mon, Sep 26, 2005 at 09:56:24AM +0200, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> > > I have exactly the same issue on amd64 & i386 since two weeks ago,
> > > gphoto2 worked like a charm before, now I have to set up a 3.7 machine
> > > only so I can get pictures from my camera :(
> > >
> > > Will it be fixed u
> > I have exactly the same issue on amd64 & i386 since two weeks ago,
> > gphoto2 worked like a charm before, now I have to set up a 3.7 machine
> > only so I can get pictures from my camera :(
> >
> > Will it be fixed until 3.8 ? I would really like to actually USE the
> > release...
>
> Curren
Hi,
On 2005-09-27 at 07:18, Andreas Bihlmaier wrote:
> I have exactly the same issue on amd64 & i386 since two weeks ago,
> gphoto2 worked like a charm before, now I have to set up a 3.7 machine
> only so I can get pictures from my camera :(
>
> Will it be fixed until 3.8 ? I would really like to
On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 10:20:20PM +0300, Antti Nykdnen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> On 2005-09-25 at 21:05, Juan J. Martmnez wrote:
> > I think this problem is related to PTP support. May be it supports other
> > protocol, from gphoto2:
>
> No, I don't think so:
>
> $ gphoto2 --camera "Canon PowerShot
Hey,
On 2005-09-25 at 21:05, Juan J. Martmnez wrote:
> I think this problem is related to PTP support. May be it supports other
> protocol, from gphoto2:
No, I don't think so:
$ gphoto2 --camera "Canon PowerShot A70" --shell
gphoto2:/usr/local/lib/libusb.so.8.2: undefined symbol 'usb_fre
El dom, 25-09-2005 a las 21:18 +0300, Antti Nykdnen escribis:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've experienced (apparently libusb-related) segmentation
> faults when trying to use gphoto2 or gtkam. I'm running a snapshot from
> Sep 23 on i386. The camera I'm trying to access is a Canon Powershot
> A70.
I thin
Hi,
Recently I've experienced (apparently libusb-related) segmentation
faults when trying to use gphoto2 or gtkam. I'm running a snapshot from
Sep 23 on i386. The camera I'm trying to access is a Canon Powershot
A70.
gphoto2 output:
$ gphoto2 --auto-detect --shell
gphoto2:/usr/local/lib/lib
12 matches
Mail list logo
