> > #pass in log on $ext_if proto tcp from to port smtp
> > rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from to port smtp \
> >-> 127.0.0.1 port spamd
> > rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from ! to port smtp \
> >-> 127.0.0.1 port spamd
>
I wrote..
>
> 'pass' is a filter rule; these are independen
On 2007/03/08 11:26, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so now i have (maybe) 1 last problem - i want to pass through the
> connections on disk before the spamd rules take place. but my modified
> pf.conf won't parse, due to an error. i understand *why* but not how
> to set this up correctly. basicall
Didier Wiroth wrote:
scenario:
pf fw running as inet gateway & NATs smtp to postfix on different
host. this works just fine but of course receives spam occasionally!
spamd appears to be a drop-on-top of your existing (working) MTA
config - i.e. no changes are required to my pf fw & postfix set
Didier Wiroth wrote:
Hello,
i've started looking at spamd & to be honest i'm a little confused
even after reading man & google. could somebody run a quick check
over all of this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/
this was a godsend!
scenario:
Hello,
i've started looking at spamd & to be honest i'm a little confused
even after reading man & google. could somebody run a quick check over
all of this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/
this was a godsend!
scenario:
pf fw running as inet
i've started looking at spamd & to be honest i'm a little confused even
after reading man & google. could somebody run a quick check over all of
this to reassure me?
NB special thanks to peter@ for http://home.nuug.no/~peter/pf/en/ this
was a godsend!
scenario:
pf fw running as inet gateway
6 matches
Mail list logo
