Checking just now since I had not seen any incoming snapshots for some time,
I just checked and it looks like
https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/
only has files dated 2024-11-17 while
https://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/
has the equivalents dated 2024-11-24
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 05:50:38PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> There seems to be some sort of network problem reaching ftp.eu.openbsd.org
> since
> some time this morning -- I had just completed a pkg_add -u on a system and
> was about to do a sysupgrade to jump to a newer s
2018-04-11 22:44 GMT+02:00 Peter J. Philipp :
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> > ftp doesn't do this itself, but the error detection in tcp and ssl
> > (ok, so that's linked into the ftp binary) do.
> >
> > The file is unlikely to have been changed in flight.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:44:28PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
| On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
| > ftp doesn't do this itself, but the error detection in tcp and ssl
| > (ok, so that's linked into the ftp binary) do.
| >
| > The file is unlikely to have been cha
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:20:37PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> ftp doesn't do this itself, but the error detection in tcp and ssl
> (ok, so that's linked into the ftp binary) do.
>
> The file is unlikely to have been changed in flight.
OK, odd. What I find odd is that the SHA256.sig file I got
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 09:52:41PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
| So I re-downloaded this file on another machine. It turned out to have your
| checksum (sha256 -b) and upon downloading another SHA256.sig it signify'ed
| correctly. But this leads me to ask questions:
|
| 1. doesn't the https
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 08:45:40PM +0200, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> Hi Peter,
Hello Paul,
> I downloaded those exact two files from the same IP addresses and the
> signature verified OK for me:
>
> [weerd@pom] $ ftp -4 https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/
On 2018-04-11, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
> Sorry to be writing this twice. Not my day.
>
> The complete path where I downloaded this from was
> https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/install63.iso
>
> including the SHA256.sig which I check against.
>
Hi Peter,
On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 07:58:56PM +0200, Peter J. Philipp wrote:
| Sorry to be writing this twice. Not my day.
|
| The complete path where I downloaded this from was
| https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/install63.iso
|
| including the SHA256.sig which I check
Sorry to be writing this twice. Not my day.
The complete path where I downloaded this from was
https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/amd64/install63.iso
including the SHA256.sig which I check against.
Also:
beta$ dig ftp.eu.openbsd.org +short
193.156.26.18
beta$ dig
Hi,
I just downloaded this install63.iso from https://ftp.eu.openbsd.org:
beta$ signify -C -p /etc/signify/openbsd-63-base.pub \
> -x SHA256.sig bsd
Signature Verified
bsd: OK
beta$ signify -C -p /etc/signify/openbsd-63-base.pub \
> -x SHA256.sig install63.iso
Sig
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 10:24:55AM +, Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2017-10-10, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> > Not looking so good.
> >
> > tonsar@jump0.swe1$ ftp ftp.eu.openbsd.org
> > Trying 193.156.26.18...
> > Connected to ftp.eu.openbsd.org (193.156.26.18).
&g
On 2017-10-10, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> Not looking so good.
>
> tonsar@jump0.swe1$ ftp ftp.eu.openbsd.org
> Trying 193.156.26.18...
> Connected to ftp.eu.openbsd.org (193.156.26.18).
> 220 jj-prod-obsdmirror.inet6.se FTP server ready.
> Name (ftp.eu.openbsd.org:tonsar): ftp
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 08:08:56PM +0200, Tony Sarendal wrote:
> Not looking so good.
>
> tonsar@jump0.swe1$ ftp ftp.eu.openbsd.org
> Trying 193.156.26.18...
> Connected to ftp.eu.openbsd.org (193.156.26.18).
> 220 jj-prod-obsdmirror.inet6.se FTP server ready.
> Name (ftp.
Not looking so good.
tonsar@jump0.swe1$ ftp ftp.eu.openbsd.org
Trying 193.156.26.18...
Connected to ftp.eu.openbsd.org (193.156.26.18).
220 jj-prod-obsdmirror.inet6.se FTP server ready.
Name (ftp.eu.openbsd.org:tonsar): ftp
331 Guest login ok, send your email address as password.
Password:
230
On 2017-08-21, Janne Johansson wrote:
> Fixed, now ftp works again, sorry for the glitch.
Use http for pkg_add anyway though, it's way faster than ftp.
Fixed, now ftp works again, sorry for the glitch.
2017-08-20 19:33 GMT+02:00 Janne Johansson :
> Will fix, have to handle strange 1:1 NAT after move to a new ftp.eu.
>
>
> 2017-08-19 12:16 GMT+02:00 Peter N. M. Hansteen :
>
>> On 08/19/17 11:44, Andreas Thulin wrote:
>> > Also, yesterday's
>> >
On Sat, Aug 19, 2017 at 12:16:14PM +0200, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
> On 08/19/17 11:44, Andreas Thulin wrote:
> > Also, yesterday's
> >
> > # pkg_add -u
> >
> > failed for me, apparently for that same reason.
>
> Yes, that would happen. Then again, changing ftp:// to https:// in
> /etc/instal
Will fix, have to handle strange 1:1 NAT after move to a new ftp.eu.
2017-08-19 12:16 GMT+02:00 Peter N. M. Hansteen :
> On 08/19/17 11:44, Andreas Thulin wrote:
> > Also, yesterday's
> >
> > # pkg_add -u
> >
> > failed for me, apparently for that same reason.
>
> Yes, that would happen. Then ag
On 08/19/17 11:44, Andreas Thulin wrote:
> Also, yesterday's
>
> # pkg_add -u
>
> failed for me, apparently for that same reason.
Yes, that would happen. Then again, changing ftp:// to https:// in
/etc/installurl would make pkg_add -u work.
- P
--
Peter N. M. Hansteen, member of the first RFC
overed that
> ftp.eu.openbsd.org apparently has dropped support for anonymous ftp:
>
> $ ncftp eu-openbsd
> NcFTP 3.2.6 (Dec 04, 2016) by Mike Gleason (http://www.NcFTP.com/contact/
> ).
> Connecting to 193.156.26.18...
>
>
> jj-prod-obsdmirror.inet6.se FTP server ready.
> User ano
About to do my few-times-a-week upgrade to the most recent snapshot for
one of my systems earlier this week, I discovered that
ftp.eu.openbsd.org apparently has dropped support for anonymous ftp:
$ ncftp eu-openbsd
NcFTP 3.2.6 (Dec 04, 2016) by Mike Gleason (http://www.NcFTP.com/contact
The mirror is now updated it seems, at least patch 008 is there.
Regards,
Kusalananada
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:28:30AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu
> Am 05/21/17 um 10:28 schrieb Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri:
>> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
>> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
>> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 14951880
Am 05/21/17 um 10:28 schrieb Andreas Kusalananda Kähäri:
> Hi,
>
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
&g
That mirror is updating way too slow.
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
> (Fri May 19 12:00:01 CEST 201
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:36:57AM +0200, Robert Peichaer wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:28:30AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda K?h?ri wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> > since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.open
On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 10:28:30AM +0200, Andreas Kusalananda K?h?ri wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
> since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
> updating. The timestamp file says last update w
Hi,
I had to switch to ftp.openbsd.org to get the 008 patch for -stable
since my preferred mirror, ftp.eu.openbsd.org, doesn't seem to be
updating. The timestamp file says last update was run on 1495188001
(Fri May 19 12:00:01 CEST 2017).
There is no contact address in
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
On 2008-08-05, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
I was wondering why hasn't there been a package of
goffice at ftp.eu.openbsd.org [1] for some time now? I
can see it on ftp.openbsd.org which seems to be
its source.
ftp.html
On 2008-08-05, Antti Harri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was wondering why hasn't there been a package of
> goffice at ftp.eu.openbsd.org [1] for some time now? I
> can see it on ftp.openbsd.org which seems to be
> its source.
>
> ftp.html didn't
Hi,
I was wondering why hasn't there been a package of
goffice at ftp.eu.openbsd.org [1] for some time now? I
can see it on ftp.openbsd.org which seems to be
its source.
ftp.html didn't have info about the server admins
so I thought I'd ask here.
[1] ftp://ftp.eu.openbsd.
32 matches
Mail list logo
