On Sat, 25 Jun 2011 13:35:44 +0200
Claudio Jeker wrote:
> Unsure if those displays will work with OpenBSD but if someone gets me on
> I will test it :)
Do you actually have media for this?
On 2011-06-25 14:23, Miod Vallat wrote:
You can buy 4096x2560 monitors. Only grayscale but the image is awsome.
For color you need to go down 6MP aka 3280x2048 30" screens.
Or there are the 2048x2048 monitors for air traffic management.
Unsure if those displays will work with OpenBSD but if someo
> You can buy 4096x2560 monitors. Only grayscale but the image is awsome.
> For color you need to go down 6MP aka 3280x2048 30" screens.
> Or there are the 2048x2048 monitors for air traffic management.
> Unsure if those displays will work with OpenBSD but if someone gets me on
> I will test it :)
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:44:45AM -0700, patrick keshishian wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Nick Holland
> wrote:
> > On 06/24/11 04:44, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> >> Some of the historic fortune(6) adages are good to have, but I have my
> >> doubts about this one:
> >>
> >> ==
Op Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:12:44 +0200 schreef Nick Holland
:
On 06/24/11 04:44, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
Some of the historic fortune(6) adages are good to have, but I have my
doubts about this one:
===
Imagine that Cray compute
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 10:20 PM, LeviaComm Networks wrote:
> And Cray does make a desktop, while it certainly doesn't fit in your pocket,
> it is more than capable of outputting to much higher resolutions than
> 4096x4096
http://www.cray.com/Products/CX/Systems.aspx
ciao,
David
On 24-Jun-11 12:16, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:44:45 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
that's so square. 4098x2304 would be much superior.
What shape are your pupils? Rectangles?
How do you know that a goat wouldn't be using it? How do you know that
goats aren't its targete
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 11:53:49 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
> >
> > What shape are your pupils? Rectangles?
>
> maybe you are special, but my peripheral vision extends more
> horizontally than it does vertically.
Actually it is positioned where you are being most alert. If you
expect high ver
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 12:16 PM, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:44:45 -0700
> patrick keshishian wrote:
>
>> that's so square. 4098x2304 would be much superior.
>
> What shape are your pupils? Rectangles?
maybe you are special, but my peripheral vision extends more
horizontally t
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:44:45 -0700
patrick keshishian wrote:
> that's so square. 4098x2304 would be much superior.
What shape are your pupils? Rectangles?
You don't need that high a res on a small screen.
Imax > Widescreen
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 4:12 AM, Nick Holland
wrote:
> On 06/24/11 04:44, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
>> Some of the historic fortune(6) adages are good to have, but I have my
>> doubts about this one:
>>
>> ===
>> Imagine that Cray
On 06/24/11 04:44, Boudewijn Dijkstra wrote:
> Some of the historic fortune(6) adages are good to have, but I have my
> doubts about this one:
>
> ===
> Imagine that Cray computer decides to make a personal computer. It has
> a 1
Some of the historic fortune(6) adages are good to have, but I have my
doubts about this one:
===
Imagine that Cray computer decides to make a personal computer. It has
a 150 MHz processor, 200 megabytes of RAM, 1500 megabytes o
13 matches
Mail list logo
