Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-25 Thread Gregor Best
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:47:05PM -0600, Theo de Raadt wrote: > [...] > Undefined? > > Sorry. But if you go look at the code, that is exactly how it works. > > Some might not like it. But that is how it works, at this time. > > I don't know what the word "undefined" means in that context. > [...

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-25 Thread Erling Westenvik
Thank you for your time everyone. Especially Gregor Best who pointed me in the right direction. I managed to get hold on the old 5.0 RELEASE in fdisk partition 2. However, afterwards I managed to do unspeakable things.. I learned a lot though. It's a first time for everything! :-D On Tue, Apr 24,

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-25 Thread Louis V. Lambrecht
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 23:35 +0200, Louis V. Lambrecht wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:52 +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > > > You do not flag which "to use". Multiple A6 entries brings problems since > > > you get multiple diskl

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Matthew Dempsky
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > You do not flag which "to use". Multiple A6 entries brings problems > since you get multiple disklabels. Perhaps it's worthwhile for fdisk to sanity check for errors like this before writing out an MBR? Index: cmd.c ===

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Theo de Raadt
> > 1. When I used "flag 1" in fdisk during install, did the installer place > > the new files in fdisk partition 1? > > [...] > > IIRC, behaviour with more than one A6 partition is undefined, but > I'd say so, since it was the first A6 the kernel encountered on > that disk. Undefined? Sorry. B

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Louis V. Lambrecht
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 22:52 +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote: > On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > > You do not flag which "to use". Multiple A6 entries brings problems since > > you get multiple disklabels. > > Trust me: I'll remember that in the future. > > > I am p

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Gregor Best
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:52:26PM +0200, Erling Westenvik wrote: > [...] > 1. When I used "flag 1" in fdisk during install, did the installer place > the new files in fdisk partition 1? > [...] IIRC, behaviour with more than one A6 partition is undefined, but I'd say so, since it was the first A6

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Erling Westenvik
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 08:14:19PM +0200, Alexander Hall wrote: > You do not flag which "to use". Multiple A6 entries brings problems since you > get multiple disklabels. Trust me: I'll remember that in the future. > I am pretty sure this is documented and in the faq and archives. Maybe so, at

Re: fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Alexander Hall
Erling Westenvik wrote: >Please ignore and forgive my obviously unforgivable ignorance: > >I wanted to test a snapshot of OpenBSD 5.1 on my ThinkPad T500 which >runs 5.0 Release. I decided to overwrite the Windows 7 installation >which I never use anyway. fdisk(8) before installation was more or

fdisk flag bootable partition during install

2012-04-24 Thread Erling Westenvik
Please ignore and forgive my obviously unforgivable ignorance: I wanted to test a snapshot of OpenBSD 5.1 on my ThinkPad T500 which runs 5.0 Release. I decided to overwrite the Windows 7 installation which I never use anyway. fdisk(8) before installation was more or less like this: #: id C