* Stuart Henderson [2010-09-22 21:41]:
> the "livelock" counter means a timeout wasn't reached in time,
> indicating the system being too busy to run userland.
> (see m_cltick(), m_cldrop() etc in sys/kern/uipc_mbuf.c,
> and the video from asiabsdcon starting about 15 minutes into
> http://www.you
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: Andre Keller ; misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:31:43 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
>
>
> the "livelock" counter means a timeout wasn't reached
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: James Peltier
> Cc: Andre Keller ; misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 12:31:43 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
> > I, unfortunately, am still experiencing livelocks on my em interfa
On 2010/09/22 10:04, James Peltier wrote:
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Stuart Henderson
> > To: Andre Keller
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 8:44:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
> >
> > On 2010/
>I, unfortunately, am still experiencing livelocks on my em interfaces on my
>Dell
>R200 server in bridging mode. I'm going to have to schedule an upgrade to the
>latest snapshot first to see if that clears up any issues, but barring that
>I'm
>not sure where to look. Perhaps I'll also try t
- Original Message
> From: Stuart Henderson
> To: Andre Keller
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Wed, September 22, 2010 8:44:26 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs [solved]
>
> On 2010/09/22 17:38, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Hi Stuart
> >
> > On 21.
On 2010/09/22 17:38, Andre Keller wrote:
> Hi Stuart
>
> On 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> > I would try wbng first. Failing that, lm. I doubt you would
> > need to disable ichiic but that would be the next step if there's
> > no improvement.
>
> well disabling wbng seems to be th
Hi Stuart
On 21.09.2010 01:28, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> I would try wbng first. Failing that, lm. I doubt you would
> need to disable ichiic but that would be the next step if there's
> no improvement.
well disabling wbng seems to be the solution. After one day of normal
traffic levels we do
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 8:31 PM, James Peltier
wrote:
> - Original Message
>
>> From: James Peltier
>> To: misc@openbsd.org
>> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 9:51:05 AM
>> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>>
>> - Original Message
>>
>
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 08:31:16PM -0700, James Peltier wrote:
> I am in bridging mode and I too, am indeed seeing a slow increase in
> livelocks on my em0 interfaces. Traffic has been quite low over the
> past week or so, so it certainly shouldn't be an issue. The only
> modifications I have mad
- Original Message
> From: James Peltier
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 9:51:05 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: James Peltier
> > To: misc@openbsd.org
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
- Original Message
> From: James Peltier
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 9:46:40 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> - Original Message
>
> > From: Joerg Goltermann
> > To: Andre Keller
&g
- Original Message
> From: Joerg Goltermann
> To: Andre Keller
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Tue, September 21, 2010 12:21:28 AM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> On 20.09.2010 19:15, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> >
> > I have some odd p
seriously, please try disabling at least wbng, i think there is no
point looking at other things until you have tried that.
On 21.09.2010 09:21, schrieb Joerg Goltermann:
> On 20.09.2010 19:15, Andre Keller wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
>> as of the beginning of september) .
>>
>> The router has 6 physical interfaces (all em, Intel 82575EB), 4 of them
>
- Original Message
> From: Andre Keller
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Cc: James Peltier
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 3:51:16 PM
> Subject: Re: em(4) ierrs
>
> Am 20.09.2010 19:54, schrieb James Peltier:
> > I see you are using LACP as your trunk protocol. You
On 20.09.2010 19:15, Andre Keller wrote:
Hi
I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
as of the beginning of september) .
The router has 6 physical interfaces (all em, Intel 82575EB), 4 of them
have traffic (about 10-20 Mbps).
which packet rate do you expect
* Andre Keller [2010-09-21 01:10]:
> As we didn't find any other advices out there we thought it might be
> worth giving it a try
ok, here's another advice that you migt wanna follow since you don't
find another:
to make your system run faster, donate all your belongings to openbsd,
then dance na
* Stuart Henderson [2010-09-21 00:47]:
> On 2010-09-20, Andre Keller wrote:
> > We did some tuning (mostly with informations from:
> > https://calomel.org/network_performance.html) and could improve the
> > performance:
>
> grr, that page again.
>
> "As a very general rule, using the on-board n
On 2010/09/21 01:07, Andre Keller wrote:
> ichiic0 at pci0 dev 31 function 3 "Intel 82801I SMBus" rev 0x02: apic 4 int
> 17 (irq 10)
> iic0 at ichiic0
> lm1 at iic0 addr 0x2d: W83627HF
> wbng0 at iic0 addr 0x2f: w83793g
> > but try disabling sensor devices or i2c controllers
> > (boot -c, disabl
Am 21.09.2010 00:43, schrieb Stuart Henderson:
> On 2010-09-20, Andre Keller wrote:
>
>> I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
>> as of the beginning of september) .
>>
>> The router has 6 physical interfaces (all em, Intel 82575EB), 4 of them
>> have traff
Am 20.09.2010 19:54, schrieb James Peltier:
> I see you are using LACP as your trunk protocol. You might want to check
> that
> all the LACP settings are correct or that there aren't any links being
> dropped
> for some reason that might cause the errors to occur. Additionally, have you
> tr
On 2010-09-20, Andre Keller wrote:
>
> I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
> as of the beginning of september) .
>
> The router has 6 physical interfaces (all em, Intel 82575EB), 4 of them
> have traffic (about 10-20 Mbps).
>
>
> We did some tuning (mostly w
- Original Message
> From: Andre Keller
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Sent: Mon, September 20, 2010 10:15:58 AM
> Subject: em(4) ierrs
>
> Hi
>
>
> I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
> as of the beginning of septembe
Hi
I have some odd packet loss on a openbsd based router (running -current
as of the beginning of september) .
The router has 6 physical interfaces (all em, Intel 82575EB), 4 of them
have traffic (about 10-20 Mbps).
We did some tuning (mostly with informations from:
https://calomel.org/net
25 matches
Mail list logo
