On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 11:42:44AM -0800, Joe wrote:
> Today I saw a blog post about a wireshark alternative called
> networtnightvision that claims to be more secure than wireshark. I'm
> very interested in this because wireshark is just too dangerous to run,
> IMO. Anyways, the sniffer is writ
in dylan. I have never heard of
dylan before. Here is a snippet from a paper [0] which the author claims:
[snip]
Is this for real? I figured if anyone could shed some light on this, an
OpenBSD developer might be able to comment on this "dylan" language. I'm
not looking to learn dy
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 11:42:44AM -0800, Joe wrote:
>
> Is this for real? I figured if anyone could shed some light on this, an
> OpenBSD developer might be able to comment on this "dylan" language. I'm
> not looking to learn dylan, but am just wondering if this i
al? I figured if anyone could shed some light on this, an
OpenBSD developer might be able to comment on this "dylan" language. I'm
not looking to learn dylan, but am just wondering if this is legit. I
wouldn't mind running one of these tools if they are indeed "safer"
4 matches
Mail list logo
