Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-05-04 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Marco Peereboom wrote: I have never tried that actually. Whenever I get to it I'll let you know. That would be great if possible. The sale on these baby from Sun end on May 7 and I got use to love the LOM so much that I try to only get Sun because of it. Moving bsd.rd from the new release to

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-05-04 Thread Marco Peereboom
I have never tried that actually. Whenever I get to it I'll let you know. On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 06:47:30AM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > Marco Peereboom wrote: > >I am running an X4100 with -current and I see no issues at all. > > If I may ask, how the "Sun Integrated Lights Out Manager (ILOM

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-05-03 Thread Srebrenko Sehic
On 5/3/07, Daniel Ouellet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If I may ask, how the "Sun Integrated Lights Out Manager (ILOM)" on this X4100 box compare to the regular LOM of the Sparc 64 series? Power cycle and possible to do full remote install via console as well like the regular Sun? I don't kno

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-05-03 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Marco Peereboom wrote: I am running an X4100 with -current and I see no issues at all. If I may ask, how the "Sun Integrated Lights Out Manager (ILOM)" on this X4100 box compare to the regular LOM of the Sparc 64 series? Power cycle and possible to do full remote install via console as well

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/25 23:14, Stuart Henderson wrote: > On 2007/04/25 16:23, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > > Is there any changes on the support of the X4200, "specially the X4100 > > M2" and X2100 M2 with SAS version, not the SATA one? There wasn't much > > updates in the archive on the subject still. > > X41

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Stuart Henderson wrote: X4100 are AMD8131, 4 em(4) nics X4200 are nvidia nforce systems, 2 em(4) nics and on solaris 2 "nge" - presumably nfe(4) here. I know what my choice would be... Thanks! (;> I know too!

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2007/04/25 16:23, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > Is there any changes on the support of the X4200, "specially the X4100 > M2" and X2100 M2 with SAS version, not the SATA one? There wasn't much > updates in the archive on the subject still. X4100 are AMD8131, 4 em(4) nics X4200 are nvidia nforce sys

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Marco Peereboom wrote: I am running an X4100 with -current and I see no issues at all. Thank you! I will order some then and will see the results. I appreciate your time. Best Daniel

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Marco Peereboom
I am running an X4100 with -current and I see no issues at all. On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 04:23:54PM -0400, Daniel Ouellet wrote: > Paul de Weerd wrote: > >Hi all, > > > >For those interested here's a copy of the dmesg output on a Sun Fire > >4200 system. More info (`sysctl hw; openssl speed; sysctl

Re: dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2007-04-25 Thread Daniel Ouellet
Paul de Weerd wrote: Hi all, For those interested here's a copy of the dmesg output on a Sun Fire 4200 system. More info (`sysctl hw; openssl speed; sysctl hw` output for the temperature difference is also included for example ;) is available at http://www.weirdnet.nl/openbsd/hardware/sunfire420

dmesg output Sun Fire 4200

2006-02-14 Thread Paul de Weerd
Hi all, For those interested here's a copy of the dmesg output on a Sun Fire 4200 system. More info (`sysctl hw; openssl speed; sysctl hw` output for the temperature difference is also included for example ;) is available at http://www.weirdnet.nl/openbsd/hardware/sunfire4200/ NB: The SAS control