Hi,
I'm experiencing similar issue than
https://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=136934201423696&w=2
with -current on an i386 APU2.
The problem is the divert-to rule is not working on interfaces that are
part of a bridge(4).
Is it a know issue?
Thank you,
Best
--
Olivier Cherrier
Phone: +3
On Mon, 27 May 2013 15:54:23 +0200
David Coppa wrote:
>
> Sure, but this is misc@openbsd.org, an *OpenBSD related* mailing list.
Sorry David,
My intention is to supplement information.
Thank you!
---
Luiz Gustavo Costa (Powered by BSD)
*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+*+
mund
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Luiz Gustavo S. Costa
wrote:
> Hello Patrick !
>
> Yes, I could not make it work, I'm using another environment that is working:
>
> FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with patch for use FORWARD and bridge
Sure, but this is misc@openbsd.org, an *OpenBSD related* mailing list.
Hello Patrick !
Yes, I could not make it work, I'm using another environment that is working:
FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE with patch for use FORWARD and bridge
These patch:
http://www.mundounix.com.br/~gugabsd/tproxy_bridge_ipfw-9.1-RELEASE.diff
Apply over a complete src of Freebsd 9.1-RELEASE
Use ipf
Hi Luiz,
I actually have seen that on a bridge setup I had, too.
Although the divert-to points to localhost, I see the packet trying to pass out
on the interface to the original destination, as your data shows, too.
No idea why that's happening though.
\Patrick
Am 23.05.2013 um 22:45 schrieb L
Hi List !
I'm trying to implement a firewall with squid TPROXY in an environment with
bridge.
vio0 = external if
vio1 = internal if
bridge0 = (vio0 + vio1)
I have these rules, the connections pass through it, but nothing comes on the
side of the divert-to (did tests with nc -l 3128)
[17:31:25
6 matches
Mail list logo