On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 04:55:45PM +0800, Lars Hansson wrote:
| On Saturday 16 December 2006 06:47, Craig Skinner wrote:
| > Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
|
| And the reason has nothing to do with the quality of DJB's stuff.
Even though many would argue that it sucks.
lease notes on Dnsmasq 2.35
http://freshmeat.net/projects/dnsmasq/?branch_id=1991&release_id=239661
/Markus
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: dhcpd question
To: misc
On Saturday 16 December 2006 06:47, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
And the reason has nothing to do with the quality of DJB's stuff.
---
Lars Hansson
On 12/16/06, Craig Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> long time back I did this on my firewalls
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
>
Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good re
- Original Message -
From: Markus Bergkvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:11 pm
Subject: Re: dhcpd question
To: misc@openbsd.org
> I noticed no-one has suggested dnsmasq, any reason for that?
> Just curious.
>
> /Markus
>
>
> Crai
I noticed no-one has suggested dnsmasq, any reason for that? Just curious.
/Markus
Craig Skinner wrote:
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
long time back I did this on my firewalls
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
Don't
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 10:47:32PM +, Craig Skinner wrote:
> Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
As far as I know, DJB software is not in ports because his opinions on
licensing and filesystem hierarchy are very different from Theo's (and
most everybody else's) not becaus
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 12:04:15AM +0530, Siju George wrote:
>
> long time back I did this on my firewalls
>
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
> http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
>
Don't do that. DJB junk is not in ports for good reasons.
Bind is patched and chrooted in base. It wont
On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 01:47:36PM -0600, Jacob Yocom-Piatt wrote:
> after having used djbdns for a while i must suggest you not use it. when
> i used to use it there was some problem where windows machines could not
> query the server and i would have to restart it. the commands to
> manipulate
Andreas Maus wrote:
Very true :-)
long time back I did this on my firewalls
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/install.html
http://cr.yp.to/djbdns/run-cache-x.html
I installed djbdns/dnscache from DJB some years ago because
of this problem. It gives you a DNS cache too so
you clients DNS lookups will spee
Hi Richard.
> yes, "don't" :)
True.
> You could write a simple script to modify dhcpd.conf as needed, but I set
I don't recommend that.
A little typo or unexpected error and all your clients are unable to resolve
or even get a lease - depending on the errors the script introduces.
This happen
On 12/14/06, Richard P. Koett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm building a firewall/router for a small private network. The
external network interface uses dhclient. The internal interface
will run dhcpd.
Rather than hard-coding 'option domain-name-servers' in dhcpd.conf
I'd like dhcpd to pass what
On 12/14/06, Nick Holland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard P. Koett wrote:
> I'm building a firewall/router for a small private network. The
> external network interface uses dhclient. The internal interface
> will run dhcpd.
>
> Rather than hard-coding 'option domain-name-servers' in dhcpd.con
Richard P. Koett wrote:
> I'm building a firewall/router for a small private network. The
> external network interface uses dhclient. The internal interface
> will run dhcpd.
>
> Rather than hard-coding 'option domain-name-servers' in dhcpd.conf
> I'd like dhcpd to pass whatever nameservers were r
I'm building a firewall/router for a small private network. The
external network interface uses dhclient. The internal interface
will run dhcpd.
Rather than hard-coding 'option domain-name-servers' in dhcpd.conf
I'd like dhcpd to pass whatever nameservers were received by the
dhclient running on t
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 06:38:09PM -0500, Dave Feustel wrote:
> I used to use a switch plugged into my dsl modem to hook up
> multiple computers to the internet, but that no longer works,
> (no reponse to 2nd computer's dhclient requests through the switch,
> although 1st computer's requests are re
I used to use a switch plugged into my dsl modem to hook up
multiple computers to the internet, but that no longer works,
(no reponse to 2nd computer's dhclient requests through the switch,
although 1st computer's requests are responded to).
So I have plugged my laptop into the 4-port(sis[0-3]) e
17 matches
Mail list logo
