of time to cover the subject during
> that time , just a few abstactions that i needed to verify with the bsd team
>
>
> thanks
>
> neko
>
>
> --- On Thu, 8/28/08, Siegbert Marschall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Siegbert Marschall <[EMAIL P
TECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dd performance question
> To: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Thursday, August 28, 2008, 6:35 AM
> >> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Neko
> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > having a 250 GB drive on a PATA st
>> On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Neko wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > having a 250 GB drive on a PATA strip using lowest PIO
>> mode (without dma if possible), drive specs show a 8 MB
>> buffer ,
>> >
..
>> > i had ran mine at 4mb block space thinking ill use the
>> 16mb bus transfer
>>
ou havent proving me that you read my question
>
> neko
>
>
> --- On Tue, 8/26/08, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: dd performance question
> > To: "Neko" <[EMAIL PROTE
neko
--- On Tue, 8/26/08, Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Marco Peereboom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dd performance question
> To: "Neko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Tuesday, August 26, 2008, 8:07 AM
> These
These types of tests should be run against the raw device. You are
proving nothing with this test.
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Neko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having a 250 GB drive on a PATA strip using lowest PIO mode (without dma if
> possible), drive specs show a 8 MB buffer ,
>
> 2
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: dd performance question
> > To: "Neko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> > Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:24 PM
> > On Mon, Aug 25, 2008
please dont use ted's way of anwsering question,
IT PERSONNAL TED THATS WHAT, if you cant stay on a subject go away,
neko
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Ted Unangst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dd performance question
>
a typo error in my last mail makes it incomprenhensible so
> other note jonathan the box im using doesnt support the
> whole drive,
> but bsd's kernel DOES once its loaded, i fear the
> rawdevices would
> bring me back to the unsupported drive in bios issue,
>
> would raw
e could comment that..
cheers !
neko
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Jonathan Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: dd performance question
> To: "Neko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: misc@openbsd.org
> Date: Monday,
I'm going to ask the obvious question. Why are you trying to do
whatever it is you're trying to do the hardest way possible?
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 9:58 PM, Neko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having a 250 GB drive on a PATA strip using lowest PIO mode (without dma if
> possible), dri
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 06:58:30PM -0700, Neko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> having a 250 GB drive on a PATA strip using lowest PIO mode (without dma if
> possible), drive specs show a 8 MB buffer ,
>
> 2 cases are : on same pata strip, one on each strip,
>
> important to note that the booted drive is
Hi all,
having a 250 GB drive on a PATA strip using lowest PIO mode (without dma if
possible), drive specs show a 8 MB buffer ,
2 cases are : on same pata strip, one on each strip,
important to note that the booted drive is the if's straight up to my slave.
(yea i know ill have to run fsck aft
13 matches
Mail list logo
