hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:05:09AM -0700, Brian Keefer said that
> On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:41 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
>>
>> of course its true downside (just like greyfiltering's) is that it
>> needs a considerable amount of babysitting. but it's worth it for me.
>
> So basically, it's not r
On Mar 25, 2009, at 9:41 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
of course its true downside (just like greyfiltering's) is that it
needs a considerable amount of babysitting. but it's worth it for me.
So basically, it's not reliable and any "work saved" from the MTA is
doubled by humans. You're failin
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 08:27:03AM -0700, Brian Keefer said that
> The amount of connections rejected by those settings will be pretty
> small as a percentage, and it's not even close to "reliable sign of
i forgot to add: YMMV.
those postfix settings have for the current week rejected 690
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:16:53AM -0300, Jose Fragoso said that
> If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
> mail from different do
On Mar 25, 2009, at 8:14 AM, frantisek holop wrote:
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Gilles Chehade said
that
Are you sure ?
just because you demonstrated a smtp session with
a questionably set up mail server it doesn't mean
you are right. sendmail by default does not check he
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 03:40:09PM +0100, Gilles Chehade said that
> Are you sure ?
just because you demonstrated a smtp session with
a questionably set up mail server it doesn't mean
you are right. sendmail by default does not check helo.
/etc/postfix/main.cf:
smtpd_helo_required = yes
s
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Paul de Weerd wrote:
> The RFC specifically states what to do if you do not have proper
> reverse mapping records (4.1.1.1 of rfc2821). It may not be best
> practice today, but your remark is utter BS.
>
Partially true, .. an EHLO may be used for further validation, but that
w
hmm, on Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:22:30AM -0500, L. V. Lammert said that
> On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> > domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> > hostname) or could it u
L. V. Lammert a icrit :
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
Hi,
If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
mail from different dom
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 09:22:30AM -0500, L. V. Lammert wrote:
| On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
|
| > Hi,
| >
| > If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
| > domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
| > hostname) or could it use a dif
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009, Jose Fragoso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
> domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
> hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
> mail from different domains?
>
> Thanks fo
Hi,
If a host is responsible for sending outgoing messages from multiple
domains, should it always use the same HELO command (ie. the same
hostname) or could it use a different HELO command when sending
mail from different domains?
Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Jose.
--
Be Yourself @ mail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
