Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread Florian Rehnisch
o sc...@web.de: > As Florian noted, not even in the corresponding mailing lists are > done the announcements. The 5.0 release announcement (and some b4) is missing on gmane, but it happened, as it is on marc (and now on cuboa ...[1]) flori [1] qbrf gung zrna gung V tb ba nf zbq sbe phobn, yrg

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 09:21:40AM +, sc...@web.de wrote: > > Speaking of which... > > You are as free to put me in your killfile, but then you > behave like a child without rational arguments. > > [...] > I have a rational argument: YOU want announcements forwarded to usenet, YOU forward

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-24 Thread scire
> Speaking of which... You are as free to put me in your killfile, but then you behave like a child without rational arguments. To resume: gmane is a bidirectional gateway list to nntp, it is an archive. The aim of usenet is something very different: to efficiently propagate news. It is not a ga

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-11-23, sc...@web.de wrote: > Thank you for the information about gmane and its *local* newsserver. > > I suppose you are aware that this is not a substitute of USENET, > although it works well and has nothing wrong. It is an archive, > it is not USENET, no one writes thing to be archived i

gmane.os.openbsd.announce (was: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce)

2011-11-23 Thread Florian Rehnisch
> Gmane, very good, I'm using zhis right now. No posts in gmane.os.openbsd.announce since Nov 2010 (48-release). Hmmm, flori

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Florian Rehnisch
Ah, there is already a thread ... Sorry for being a bad moderator, but maybe better than none... @naddy, I used OpenBSD only vary occasional in the basic install, so never had a question or sth to tribuate. Gmane, very good, I'm using zhis right now. {security-,}annou...@lists.openbsd.de --> cu

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Jan Stary
On Nov 23 12:54:32, sc...@web.de wrote: > I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to > comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce. So why didn't you forward them?

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread scire
ones that do the announcements, should just forward them to comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce: a seccond person making "copy and paste" will not do it efficiently, also not with the best connection and hardware. It was good that Florian Rehnisch did the job, but he renounced and there

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Christian Weisgerber
wrote: > This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove moderated > newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce." > > --- > > Is really no one interessted on the group? Apparently not. I was quite surprised when two years ago one Florian Rehnisch

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Christian Weisgerber
wrote: > I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to > comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce. And yet it appears you have not done so. -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber na...@mips.inka.de

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Gilles Chehade
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:54:32PM +, sc...@web.de wrote: > > [...] blabla [...] > > I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to > comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce. > Feel free -- Gilles Chehade http://www.poolp.org@poolpOrg

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread scire
USENET. I cannot see any reason not to forward OpenBSD anouncements to comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce. Rodrigo

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread scire
Thank you for the information about gmane and its *local* newsserver. I suppose you are aware that this is not a substitute of USENET, although it works well and has nothing wrong. It is an archive, it is not USENET, no one writes thing to be archived inmediately, it is not the place for posting.

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Dennis Davis
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, sc...@web.de wrote: > From: sc...@web.de > To: misc@openbsd.org > Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 10:32:04 > Subject: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce ... > I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox. Note you can read this mailing list as a newsgrou

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2011-11-23, sc...@web.de wrote: > I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox. > I am in this mailing list only because also "comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc" > is dying. Perhaps the next openbsd newsgroup to be deleted. I find that gmane.os.openbsd.misc / gmane.os.openbsd.announce

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Olugbenga Ashiru
web.de> writes: > Is really no one interessted on the group? Everyone knows that OpenBSD is dying and you should too.

Re: comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread Andreas Vögele
sc...@web.de writes: I preffer newsgroups than mailing lists filling my mailbox. I am in this mailing list only because also "comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.misc" is dying. Perhaps the next openbsd newsgroup to be deleted. Is realy no one interested on the newsgroups? What's wrong with gmane.org and the

comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce

2011-11-23 Thread scire
Just see news.groups.proposals: " REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD) moderated group comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove moderated newsgroup comp.unix.bsd.openbsd.announce." --- Is really no one inte