On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 10:46 PM, quartz wrote:
>> put a 5.0 kernel in the root directory of your file system with the name
>> "bsd50". B At the "boot>" prompt, do a "boot bsd50". B If the kernel loads
>> all the way, it's just an issue with the bsd.rd kernel. B if it doesn't,
>> it's a 5.0-rel is
> put a 5.0 kernel in the root directory of your file system with the name
> "bsd50". At the "boot>" prompt, do a "boot bsd50". If the kernel loads
> all the way, it's just an issue with the bsd.rd kernel. if it doesn't,
> it's a 5.0-rel issue.
that's obvious and I should have thought of that m
On 11/26/11 00:21, quartz wrote:
how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
system or should I wait for the official 5.0 stable branch?
>
> different version of the same question:
>
> if I'm lazy, can I cheat by booting off a new install50 or cd50 snapshot,
>
>>> how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
>>> system or should I wait for the official 5.0 stable branch?
different version of the same question:
if I'm lazy, can I cheat by booting off a new install50 or cd50 snapshot,
but actually install the packages from insta
>> how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
>> system or should I wait for the official 5.0 stable branch?
>>
> The only time -current is NOT to be trusted is in the middle
> of a Hackathon, where you can watch commits flying in.
> Watch, but wait till its over before
On 11/22/11 01:09, quartz wrote:
ok, so whatever was wrong has fixed itself sometime between release and
11/16, because both the 11/16 and 11/20 install50 snapshot images boot
fine.
how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
system or should I wait for the official 5.
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:09 PM, quartz wrote:
> ok, so whatever was wrong has fixed itself sometime between release and
> 11/16, because both the 11/16 and 11/20 install50 snapshot images boot
> fine.
>
> how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
> system or should I
ok, so whatever was wrong has fixed itself sometime between release and
11/16, because both the 11/16 and 11/20 install50 snapshot images boot
fine.
how "safe" are those two images? would it be ok to run on a production
system or should I wait for the official 5.0 stable branch?
here's the dmesg from a 4.9 install. this is with everything in the bios
turned on, and two ethernet cards installed. I'm downloading both the
11/16 and 11/20 snapshot install50 from my mirror, I'll test them out
later tonight.
---
OpenB
On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 5:44 PM, quartz wrote:
> first off, apologies if this is a known issue. I didn't see anything
> relevant in the release notes/changes, and nothing came up in a google
> search.
>
> I have an older pentium 3 machine. 450mhz cpu, 100mhz bus, intel "sun
> river" 440bx motherbo
first off, apologies if this is a known issue. I didn't see anything
relevant in the release notes/changes, and nothing came up in a google
search.
I have an older pentium 3 machine. 450mhz cpu, 100mhz bus, intel "sun
river" 440bx motherboard, 128mb of ram (of which something like 12 are
being use
11 matches
Mail list logo
