On 6/25/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
thanks, good work.
> I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_misc.c.diff?r1=1.140&r2=1.141
>
>
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_mmap.h.diff?r1=1.16&r2=1.17
>
> h
> As it turns out, this bug in compat_linux was encountered in NetBSD in
> 2005 and then fixed. The NetBSD patches are
I have successfully ported the relevant material from the NetBSD patches
http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/sys/compat/linux/common/linux_misc.c.diff?r1=1.140&r2=1.141
> > 20188 MathKernel CALL mprotect(0xcfbc1000,0x1000,0x107)
> > 20188 MathKernel RET mprotect -1 errno 22 Invalid argument
>
> In OpenBSD, the only legal values for the third argument of mprotect are
> the bitwise sums of
>
> #define PROT_NONE 0x00/* no permissions */
>
> right. i'm not even sure what the growsdown flag does.
Indeed, Linux doesn't have the same standard of documentation as OpenBSD.
The PROT_GROWSDOWN flag for mprotect is not even mentioned in mprotect's
man page on linux
http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl2_mprotect.htm
On 6/20/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It appears that a similar bug was encountered by Debian in 2005. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00289.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00311.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00
It appears that a similar bug was encountered by Debian in 2005. See
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00289.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00311.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-glibc/2005/08/msg00483.html
This would suggest that it might be a problem w
OK, I have some question about the ktrace. The first notable call is the
following:
> 20188 MathKernel CALL mprotect(0xcfbc1000,0x1000,0x107)
> 20188 MathKernel RET mprotect -1 errno 22 Invalid argument
In OpenBSD, the only legal values for the third argument of mprotect are
the bitwi
> I'm trying to get Mathematica to run on OpenBSD via Linux emulation, but
> I am getting the following error:
>
> error while loading shared libraries: libvml.so: cannot enable executable
> stack as shared object requires: Premission denied.
Note that libvml.so is t
On 6/10/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what does ktrace say about the problem?
>
The ktrace output is as follows:
the libvml from your original email is mentioned nowhere.
12262 MathKernel NAMI "/usr/lib/tls/libML32i3.so"
12262 MathKernel RET open -1 errno 2 No such fi
> what does ktrace say about the problem?
>
The ktrace output is as follows:
12262 ktrace RET ktrace 0
12262 ktrace CALL execve(0xcfbd0bd3,0xcfbd0a8c,0xcfbd0a94)
12262 ktrace NAMI
"/usr/local/emul/fedora/usr/local/Wolfram/Mathematica/6.0/SystemFiles/Kernel/Binaries/Linux/MathKernel
On 6/10/07, Matthew Szudzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm trying to get Mathematica to run on OpenBSD via Linux emulation, but
I am getting the following error:
error while loading shared libraries: libvml.so: cannot enable executable
stack as shared object requires: Premission de
I'm trying to get Mathematica to run on OpenBSD via Linux emulation, but
I am getting the following error:
error while loading shared libraries: libvml.so: cannot enable executable
stack as shared object requires: Premission denied.
Does anyone have any suggestions about how I might
13 matches
Mail list logo
