On Jul 6, 2005, at 9:03 AM, Todd C. Miller wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Jim Fron (j-fron.q.public):
Yes, I'm getting the feeling that what I'm seeing is "not
normal." As
I've said, I have a suspicion that it's due to the le[dma] SBUS
interfaces not having their own MA
I've been informed, if I understand correctly, that bridge isn't intended to do
what I want to do with it.
FWIW, anyone who is interested, I'm hanging up the modification effort at "half
complete," because it accomplishes everything I need. That is, I'm interested
in blocking traffic to the ro
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
so spake Jim Fron (j-fron.q.public):
> Yes, I'm getting the feeling that what I'm seeing is "not normal." As
> I've said, I have a suspicion that it's due to the le[dma] SBUS
> interfaces not having their own MAC address, and that somehow getting
> confus
On Feb 25, 2005, at 3:43 AM, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote:
Jim Fron wrote:
Since I'm running an SS20, all of my _real_ interfaces have the same
MAC address (for Sparc 32-bit, it's a property of the machine, not
the NIC).
My SS20 is not at hand for the moment, but i do think there is an open
Good news! I'm half-way there.
I took Camiel's patch to bridge_input() in if_bridge.c ref:
google:"bridging vlans on a single interface" and modified it slightly
so that the source interface would not get rewritten if the destination
mac address matches, period. (no longer vlan-specific)
T
Okay, here's the deal: when I bridge two interfaces, one of which has
an IP address, traffic from nodes on one side to the other passes
through pf just fine, all rules matching properly. Traffic TO the
OpenBSD system itself hits pf rules for "in" on "le2," and "out" on
"le0" regardless of whic
This is an intriguing problem that certaiinly is going against
everything I know about how pf and bridging is supposed to work on
OpenBSD. Anyhow, I have come up with some things that might help you
ascertain what is going on with the firewall. I reread your initial
emails and follow ups to e
On Feb 27, 2005, at 2:00 PM, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
On Sun, 27 Feb 2005, Jim Fron wrote:
Yes, I'm getting the feeling that what I'm seeing is "not normal."
As I've
said, I have a suspicion that it's due to the le[dma] SBUS interfaces
not
having their own MAC address, and that somehow getti
I found this:
http://openbsd.automagic.org/plus.html
"Apply bridge filter rules to frames destined for the local machine,
so a
single-interface bridge can do filtering and tagging."
And then searched on that phrase, and found this:
http://www.monkey.org/openbsd/arch
9 matches
Mail list logo
