On 2025-03-16, Jon Higgs wrote:
> On 16/03/25 11:51, Rub??n Llorente wrote:
>> As far as I understand, raid 5 performance is usually slower than you
>> would expect because parity data needs to be computed and written to
>> the drives too.
softraid's implementation of RAID5 is not particularly qu
On 16/03/25 11:51, Rub??n Llorente wrote:
> As far as I understand, raid 5 performance is usually slower than you
> would expect because parity data needs to be computed and written to
> the drives too.
I just tested this on my machine with a pair of SSDs in RAID1. It was
still under 50MB/s.
Divan Santana wrote:
Greetings :)
I have a openbsd 76 system (dmesg [1]) with bioctl raid5 setup. It
achieves performance writes of between 18-43 MB/s with a dd test[2] and
7-11 MB/s with rsync tests[3]. But the backend drives are reported to
write at 220MB/s according to it's vendor spec [4].
Greetings :)
I have a openbsd 76 system (dmesg [1]) with bioctl raid5 setup. It
achieves performance writes of between 18-43 MB/s with a dd test[2] and
7-11 MB/s with rsync tests[3]. But the backend drives are reported to
write at 220MB/s according to it's vendor spec [4]. I would expect with
a
4 matches
Mail list logo
