I know about m:tier. I thought there were plans for binary security
patches on stable without using m:tier.
On 09/01/2017 12:58 PM, GSO wrote:
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see: https://man.openbs
Yess, openup... amazing tool and call syspatch, too! :p
Le 09/01/17 à 11:58, GSO a écrit :
> M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
>
> On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>>
>> I think he meant binary stable
M:Tier provide stable package updates https://stable.mtier.org/
On 1 September 2017 at 10:54, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
> --
> Web: http
Yes
On 09/01/2017 12:54 PM, Aaron Marcher wrote:
>> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
>
> I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
> for the base system.
>
> Regards,
> Aaron
>
> Yes, see: https://man.openbsd.org/syspatch
I think he meant binary stable updates for packages. syspatch is only
for the base system.
Regards,
Aaron
--
Web: https://drkhsh.at/ or http://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion/
Gopher: gopher://drkhsh.at or gopher://drkhsh5rv6pnahas.onion
GPG: 0x09e71697435bf5
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 12:01:42PM +0300, G wrote:
> A couple of months ago i have read this
>
> https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
>
> are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
Yes, see: https://man.openb
A couple of months ago i have read this
https://www.bsdfrog.org/pub/events/my_bsd_sucks_less_than_yours-AsiaBSDCon2017-paper.pdf
are there any new developments for packages binary updates?
thanks in advance
The main reason we don't have binary stable updates is that no-one we
trust has the time to build them. It means maintaining an extra machine
that would only track stable, do builds, do the equivalent of releases.
One release every six months is a lot of work already.
If people want to provide sta
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 09:23:40PM +1300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >On 2/26/07, Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
> >>off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just t
On 2/26/07, Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system.
Binary updating - try it, you'
Just curious - why are you using a system that you don't understand
the philosophy of? No, that came out wrong. Why aren't you trying to
better understand the system you are using?
On 2/26/07, Default User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
When will we ever see binary updates for Op
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:31:08 -0600, Default User wrote:
>When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
>off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
>and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system.
>
>Binary updating -
When will we ever see binary updates for OpenBSD? Taking a system
off-line for over 20 hours to do a source code rebuild is just too long,
and just tracking RELEASE means running an insecure system.
Binary updating - try it, you'll like it!
13 matches
Mail list logo
