On Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:10:22 +0100, Alexander Hall wrote:
>...and in rc.conf(8):
>
>"It is advisable to leave the /etc/rc.conf file untouched, and instead
> create and edit a new /etc/rc.conf.local file. Variables set in this
> file will override variables previously set in /etc/rc.conf."
>
Ther
Stuart Henderson wrote:
> On 2009-11-30, ~Lst wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
>>> ~Lst wrote:
>>>
Well gentlemen...
Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
On 2009-11-30, ~Lst wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
>> ~Lst wrote:
>>
>>> Well gentlemen...
>>> Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
>>> mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
>>>
>>> 1. The bgpd_flags that is run
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 12:10 AM, Alexander Hall wrote:
> ~Lst wrote:
>
>> Well gentlemen...
>> Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
>> mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
>>
>> 1. The bgpd_flags that is running via /etc/rc.conf.local
>> (bgpd_
~Lst wrote:
> Well gentlemen...
> Right now, it looks like my bgplg has been running well, because of my
> mistake that is the running of bgpd_flags in two places.
>
> 1. The bgpd_flags that is running via /etc/rc.conf.local
> (bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock" -> exactly like described in
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 4:07 AM, Robert wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:44:23 +1100
> "Rod Whitworth" wrote:
>
>> I don't think that he to put it there. That is where a clean
>> install puts it.
>
> Oh, i see, my bad.
>
>> Have a look at your own machine.
>
> Not there, my upgrades handle some d
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:44:23 +1100
"Rod Whitworth" wrote:
> I don't think that he to put it there. That is where a clean
> install puts it.
Oh, i see, my bad.
> Have a look at your own machine.
Not there, my upgrades handle some directories differently, eg. /var/www
does not get stuff that i
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:11:29 +0100, Robert wrote:
>On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:50:30 +0700
>"~Lst" wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert wrote:
>> >
>> > *chuckle*
>> >
>> > If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would
>> > have to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplg
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 11:50:30 +0700
"~Lst" wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert wrote:
> >
> > *chuckle*
> >
> > If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would
> > have to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplgsh because of the changed
> > root. ;)
> >
> > # man chroot
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Robert wrote:
>
> *chuckle*
>
> If you were running bgplgsh in a chroot from the cmdline you would have
> to execute it by invoking /bin/bgplgsh because of the changed root. ;)
>
> # man chroot
> # sudo chroot -u www -g www /var/www /bin/bgplgsh
>
> Lots of patienc
On Sun, 29 Nov 2009 04:42:34 +0700
"~Lst" wrote:
> >> >> Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
> >> >
>
> I tried running bgplgsh under chroot, still works if its via CLI but
> not via web.
>
> -bash-4.0# ps -aux | grep chroot
> www 4592 0.0 0.3 1356 2120 ?? Ss
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:56 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> > [ snippzorz ]
>> >
>> >> Could you tell me how is running
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 02:09:49AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> > [ snippzorz ]
> >
> >> Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
> >
> > man 1 chroot
> >
>
> -bash-4.0# m
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> [ snippzorz ]
>
>> Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
>
> man 1 chroot
>
-bash-4.0# man 1 chroot
man: no entry for chroot in section 1 of the manual.
Same result
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:56:19AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
[ snippzorz ]
> Could you tell me how is running bgplgsh under chroot ?
man 1 chroot
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Bret S. Lambert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
>> > Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
>> >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Am 28.11.2009 1
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 01:25:03AM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
> >> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> >>
> >>> Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
> >>>
> No, I just install and followed
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 1:15 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 18:34, schrieb ~Lst:
>> On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
>>
>>> Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
>>>
No, I just install and followed manual
>>> You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configu
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:19 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
>> No, I just install and followed manual.
>>
>
> You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration
It might be I missed a step, Could you help where is the step that I missed ?
>> And if via
Am 28.11.2009 16:36, schrieb ~Lst:
> No, I just install and followed manual.
>
You either missed a step or run an very uncommon configuration
> What I don't undertand, why ping, traceroute and show version is ok,
> and anything else is failed (if it's via web).
>
Well "anything else" is any
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 10:05 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Hi
>
> well I just did a installation of 4.6 and tried the bgplg thingy.
>
>
> it took me 4 steps:
>
> bgpd -r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock
> chmod 0555 /var/www/bin/bgpctl
> chmod 0555 /var/www/cgi-bin/bgplg
> httpd
>
>
> Did you do anything els
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>
> Hmmm, I just remembered another setting that isn't default:
> Try ls -l /var/www/bin/bgpctl
> What does that show?
>
-bash-4.0# ls -l /var/wwwbin/bgpctl
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 55048 Jul 10 10:07 /var/www/bin/bgpctl
Rgds,
--
~Lst
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 09:21:55PM +1100, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
> >/sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock'
>
> That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly
> and doesn't have the OP's
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 16:45:55 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
>> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>>
>>>Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
>>>didn't work too.
>>>Did I miss the configuration ?
>>
>> Let us
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 10:58:39 +0100, Joachim Schipper wrote:
>/sbin/nologin -c '/var/www/bin/bgpctl -s /var/ww/logs/bgpd.rsock'
That command does not work on my bgpd router which is working perfectly
and doesn't have the OP's problem. Executing it gives a result like his
"This account is currently
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 04:27:12PM +0700, ~Lst wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> > Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
> >> -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
> >> bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
> >>
> >> The socket is working...
> >>
> >> -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>
>>Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
>>didn't work too.
>>Did I miss the configuration ?
>
> Let us see:
> 1> output of mount (the command)
> 2>ls -l /var/ww
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
>>
>> -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
>> bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
>>
>> The socket is working...
>>
>> -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory
>> RDE memory statisti
On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 15:42:51 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>Yes, I know. If it's wrong via web, it should be the cmd show version
>didn't work too.
>Did I miss the configuration ?
Let us see:
1> output of mount (the command)
2>ls -l /var/www/cgi-bin
Those two might be enough.
Please reply ONLY to the list
Am 28.11.2009 09:45, schrieb ~Lst:
>
> -bash-4.0# cat /etc/rc.conf.local
> bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
>
> The socket is working...
>
> -bash-4.0# bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show ip bgp memory
> RDE memory statistics
> 299643 IPv4 network entries using 6.9M of memory
>
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:55 AM, Andre Keller wrote:
> Hi
>
> Seems that you cannot connect to bgpd
>
> Are you sure
>
> bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
>
> is present in your rc.conf.local?
>
> is the socket working?
>
> (bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show rib )
>
>
> hth andre
On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 4:27 AM, Rod Whitworth wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
>>ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
>>http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122670411001369&w=2).
>>E
Hi
Seems that you cannot connect to bgpd
Are you sure
bgpd_flags="-r /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock"
is present in your rc.conf.local?
is the socket working?
(bgpctl -s /var/www/logs/bgpd.rsock show rib )
hth andre
Am 26.11.2009 21:06, schrieb ~Lst:
> Hi,
>
> I've already setup bgplg on my
On Fri, 27 Nov 2009 03:06:59 +0700, ~Lst wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
>ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
>http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122670411001369&w=2).
>Everything else is not work, such as show ip bgp memory, etc...
>
Hi,
I've already setup bgplg on my test machine, but only show version,
ping and traceroute that is work (suggested from
http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-misc&m=122670411001369&w=2).
Everything else is not work, such as show ip bgp memory, etc...
I followed man pages and checked everything but still it
35 matches
Mail list logo
