Re: anyone tried bgpd vs. he.net/tunnelbroker.net

2005-11-30 Thread Henning Brauer
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-11-28 01:41]: > > your only workaround is to not send any capability it does not grok. > this is guesswork. you might want to try to not announce v4 unicast > capabilities... > > > I was wondering exactly how this was specified in the bgpd.conf file?

Re: anyone tried bgpd vs. he.net/tunnelbroker.net

2005-11-27 Thread unixgeek
your only workaround is to not send any capability it does not grok. this is guesswork. you might want to try to not announce v4 unicast capabilities... I was wondering exactly how this was specified in the bgpd.conf file? Since I was trying to do the same thing to connect to he.net and try out

Re: anyone tried bgpd vs. he.net/tunnelbroker.net

2005-09-19 Thread jared r r spiegel
On Mon, Sep 19, 2005 at 10:30:29AM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote: > > the peer is broken and needs to be fixed. > > your only workaround is to not send any capability it does not grok. > this is guesswork. you might want to try to not announce v4 unicast > capabilities. that did it. --- 4801a

Re: anyone tried bgpd vs. he.net/tunnelbroker.net

2005-09-19 Thread Henning Brauer
* jared r r spiegel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-18 06:50]: > tried it a while ago (~3.6?) with openbsd bgpd and it > would bomb on me complaining of unsupported capability. > Sep 17 23:08:02 4801a bgpd[21303]: neighbor 2001:470:1f01:::122 (he.net): > re > ceived notification: error in OP

anyone tried bgpd vs. he.net/tunnelbroker.net

2005-09-17 Thread jared r r spiegel
hurricane electric has that IPv6 thing where they'll bgp with you so you can get their view of IPv6 internet. tried it a while ago (~3.6?) with openbsd bgpd and it would bomb on me complaining of unsupported capability. tried it on sep.1 current and same thing. when i watch tcpdump,