Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On 02/25/11 15:21, Ron McDowell wrote: ... > No, sorry, I started with an empty /usr/src. Given that, what would > checkout -rHEAD [as shown above] do? I'm trying to understand, "wrap my > head around", if you will, this concept... Thanks. Just stick to the instructions in faq5.html (which don

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

Philip Guenther wrote: I'm sorry to say, but as soon as I read "update to HEAD" I recognized the problem. Namely, you have been mislead by "cvs": You're right. I now have a clean build. cvs -d anon...@anoncvs3.usa.openbsd.org:/cvs checkout -rHEAD -P src definitely != cvs -d anon..

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

WARNING: the following post involves an old fart jumping up and down and screaming, mostly at shitty documentation. On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Ron McDowell wrote: > Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34A

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 02:00:48AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:54:49AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > > > > > >> Otto Moerbeek wrote: > >> > >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Fr

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:54:49AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > > >> Otto Moerbeek wrote: >> >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > N

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 01:54:49AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > Otto Moerbeek wrote: > >On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > > >>On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > >> > >>>Nick Holland wrote: > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: >

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > > >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: >> >> >>> Nick Holland wrote: >>> On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: > System installed from a

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 08:28:42AM +0100, Otto Moerbeek wrote: > On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > > > Nick Holland wrote: > > > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: > > > > > >> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less > > >> th

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 12:55:34AM -0600, Ron McDowell wrote: > Nick Holland wrote: > > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: > > > >> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less > >> than an hour ago... > >> > > > > No, your process is broke. > > Please read

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

Nick Holland wrote: > On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: > >> System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less >> than an hour ago... >> > > No, your process is broke. > Please read FAQ5. > The part you definitely violated is 5.3.2 > > Nick. > Thanks. Okay,

Re: amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

On 02/24/11 20:15, Ron McDowell wrote: > System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less > than an hour ago... No, your process is broke. Please read FAQ5. The part you definitely violated is 5.3.2 Nick.

amd64 build of HEAD from 02/24 6:30pm CST broke...

System installed from a 4.8-amd64 CD today, then cvs-update to HEAD less than an hour ago... cc -O2 -pipe -g -DL_ENDIAN -DDSO_DLFCN -DHAVE_DLFCN_H -DTERMIOS -DANSI_SOURCE -DNO_ERR -DNO_WINDOWS_BRAINDEATH -DOPENSSL_NO_IDEA -DOPENSSL_NO_RC5 -DOPENSSL_NO_KRB5 -DOPENSSL_NO_MDC2 -DOPENSSL_NO_GOST