Re: altq merge

2009-02-09 Thread Stuart Henderson
On 2009-02-09, irix wrote: > Hello Misc, > > In that freebsd list tell as in 2002 in OpenBSD list "will merge". > > "The "options ALTQ_CDNR" is a dummy at the moment. It introduces a > function > pointer in ip_input() that can be used as conditioner hook, but it is not > used at the moment

Re: altq merge

2009-02-09 Thread irix
Hello Misc, In that freebsd list tell as in 2002 in OpenBSD list "will merge". "The "options ALTQ_CDNR" is a dummy at the moment. It introduces a function pointer in ip_input() that can be used as conditioner hook, but it is not used at the moment. There are plans to resurrect the conditio

altq merge

2009-02-09 Thread Alexey Suslikov
irix wrote: > Hello Misc, > > When the final port altq in pf? And then in 2002 and stretches porting CDNR, > the \ > kernel ported in pf no. > > Here is an excerpt from the log of 16.12.2002 about altq > > Log message: > switchover to pf-based altq. > - remove files which are no longer used, or

altq merge

2009-02-09 Thread irix
Hello Misc, When the final port altq in pf? And then in 2002 and stretches porting CDNR, the kernel ported in pf no. Here is an excerpt from the log of 16.12.2002 about altq Log message: switchover to pf-based altq. - remove files which are no longer used, or we don't have plans to support